Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Boudicea's column >>

BOUDICEA

Warrior of the People
Articles Posted: 183  Links Seeded: 63
Member Since: 8/2009  Last Seen: 2/24/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Smokers - Fight Back!!!!

Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:19 PM EDT
health, taxes, smoking
By Boudicea
Advertise | AdChoices

In the last five years, cigarette smokers have become just a little less reviled than serial killers. As a result, the government (both state and federal) have seen fit to impose taxes on cigarettes the likes of which haven't been seen since the Tea taxes back in 1773.

In fact, $2.60 of the cost of each pack is federal and state excise taxes. This is in Pennsylvania. Some states are MUCH higher.

Now my husband and I both smoke - yes, I KNOW it's not good for us, but there it is. In fact, we each smoke over a pack a day. By my calculations, we are spending approximately $12.00 each per day, for a total of $720 per month. That's $4,062 per year on state and federal excise tax and local sales tax. Well, that's the cost of smoking, right? WRONG!

Today I decided I'd had enough. I went to the cigarette store and bought a rolling machine ($39.99) a package of 200 filtered cigarette tubes ($3.49) and a package of tobacco ($5.49) Excluding the price of the machine, this brings my cost per carton of cigarettes to $10.59 after sales tax. Cost per pack of cigarettes? $1.06. That's a savings of $5.04 per pack, taking my daily cigarette expenditures from $24.40 to $4.24. My new monthly expenditures on cigarettes will be around $127 for both of us.

I am also NOT inhaling about 5039838593 chemicals that are normally added to manufactured cigarettes. Win-Win situation all around. I get to save money and at the same time legally screw the government out of nearly four thousand dollars a year in "sin" tax.

So in conclusion, I say, Smokers - Fight Back!

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Boudicea's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Bar Room Debates, FOX NEWS, FoxNews, Free Market, Libertarians, Power to The People!, Tattoo News, The Gutter Girls, The Sovereign States of America
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (809)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
Boudicea

I'll quit when I want to quit - NOT when the Federal government adds so many taxes I have no choice.

  • 73 votes
#1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:20 PM EDT
HunterHawke

AMEN!!! Can I vote more than once for that comment?? Please?? Please??

  • 26 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:29 PM EDT
frostyone

thanks for putting this out there kjmgirl :)

I'd forgotten all about getting everything separate and rolling my own cigs but now I can show the wife the cost difference.

  • 19 votes
#1.2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:35 PM EDT
Norcal2

Here is the thing...

The government makes more money off each pack you buy than anyone else so these taxes won't go away. They do not want you to quit or all those funds they collect would go toward smoking issues and stop-smoking campaigns or free clinics to stop, or free or lower cost stop-smoking kits. So now the government depends on smoker's smoking to fund anything from soup to nuts, anything but smoking prevention if percentages mean anything. They are addicted to you and they are really going to be mad. lol

The government needs to either ban it or get their hands out of the profit business. Seriously at this point no one is fooled and no one is happy. That is why both sides of any argument are frustrated.

  • 21 votes
#1.3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:08 PM EDT
Rainbow Warrior

I would gladly pay a higher tax on something that gets you higher, so we could grow hemp again. Too bad law enforcement can't tell the difference between rope and dope ; - )

With the natural resistance hemp has to mold and mildew it could become the miracle building material of the 21st Century... and anyone could grow it!

  • 25 votes
#1.4 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:12 PM EDT
Boudicea

Rainbow - not to mention that it grows 3 times faster than cotton and would be able to be used for clothing at a much lower cost.

  • 17 votes
#1.5 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:16 PM EDT
Dowser

Please tell me it wouldn't itch. Please?

The thought makes me itch...

  • 9 votes
#1.6 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:19 PM EDT
Boudicea

No, Dowser, it wouldn't itch! You're a hoot! Good to see you around.

  • 6 votes
#1.7 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:22 PM EDT
Dowser

I was thinking, hemp, rope, itch... Thanks kjmgirl! Good to see you, too!

  • 8 votes
#1.8 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:24 PM EDT
Rainbow Warrior

I'm setting here in a half silk, half hemp shirt (from France damn it)... no itching! Don't forget paper, very fine oil and the non-GMO protein food additive potential.

  • 10 votes
#1.9 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:26 PM EDT
Dowser

Neat, Rainbow! Appreciate the info!

Thanks, both of you!

  • 7 votes
#1.10 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:34 PM EDT
G. H.

Dowser, my dear...............I have an awesome hemp sweater/shirt. Neutral color, SOFT, doesn't itch at all. Don't know where it was purchased though, or where I could get any other clothing like it. It's difficult to explain its properties, but it is one of my very favorite tops, Spring or Fall. ♥ ((Dowser)) ♥

  • 7 votes
#1.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:46 AM EDT
usa1

I could never understand this tax on cigarettes, originally the tax and the law suits against big tobacco were to be used to offset health costs of cigarette smokers. I have yet found one person who smokes getting treated for free due to a smoking related illness.

When I lived in the States I bought my cigarettes from an Indian reservation, no taxes and cheaper. The local police would harass people outside the reservation with confiscations and loop hole laws to pull them over. This was not legal and the courts agreed it stopped, but they continued to target and monitor activity of the reservation. Nothing worse than going for a carton of cigarettes and having to act like a criminal hiding the contraband.

Ok I now live in China (my wife is originally from here) cigarettes are about 30 cents to 1.50 depending on the brand. My brand Kent and Marlboro lights are 1.00. Now some will say it is an authoritative government here but actually when I lived in NY the control over my life were far greater, if I was a millionaire fine this tax and others would not matter but as an averaged paid American these taxes did control my life and choices. Unhealthy or not like the new sin tax on soda will only hurt average people.

  • 17 votes
#1.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:18 AM EDT
Tim O.

LOL, great posting, as I sit here and self pack my own cig's with a little hand machine to stuff my filtered tubes. I've seen the same thing happen with the prices going up and it does vary by state. Before I left the states for Germany in Maryland I was paying $52.60 a carton, I'd drive to Virginia and pay $36.80 instead for the same brand. Now this was aslo using my military abilities and not having to pay sales tax, but I wondered WHY the difference per state. Found out that Maryland was one of the states back in April 2009 that had the Huge price tax per pack.

But now, I too spend about 3 hours to stuff 10 packs worth of cig's for my wife and I at the cost of about $20.00 a carton.

  • 7 votes
#1.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:29 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

I'd be fine with cutting the taxes, if all smokers sign a waiver agreeing not to use public health systems for any smoking-related illness. Deal?

  • 10 votes
#1.14 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:21 AM EDT
Fufu

My only real objection to the cigarette taxes is that they aren't high enough. Even at the amount that kjmgirl and her husband are spending every year on tobacco taxes, it won't be nearly enough to cover the cost of their medical care that is a direct result of smoking (even with their insurance thrown in), much less the cost of anti-smoking campaigns.

Smoking is a drain on individuals, a drain on families, and a drain on society. Taxes should be raised 100% and anyone who chooses to spend their money on smoking should be ineligible for federal assistance (note: not that I am saying kjmgirl falls into this category, it's just a general belief on my part).

  • 16 votes
#1.15 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:25 AM EDT
TheJonesGirlExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Amen, FuFu. Smokers love to play the victim, while thinking their vice deserves to be coddled.

  • 14 votes
#1.16 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:45 AM EDT
Pat N

I'd be fine with cutting the taxes, if all smokers sign a waiver agreeing not to use public health systems for any smoking-related illness. Deal?

You DO realize that obesity related illnesses puts more of a drain on our public health system than smoking does, right? I assume that means you're A-OK with the gov't taxing the foods you love or you signing a waiver not to use the public health system?

  • 34 votes
#1.17 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:53 AM EDT
micrometer

usa1

I also escaped from the "Peoples Republic of New York" in 2000.

As for purchasing name brand cigarettes from local stores vs. tax free or limited tax sources, I'd like to encourage everyone to keep buying from local stores and paying the tax. The government is dependant on the revenue from tobacco tax, and if deprived, they will just tax something else.

  • 2 votes
#1.18 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:58 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

You DO realize that obesity related illnesses puts more of a drain on our public health system than smoking does, right?

I love it when people post responses that I can then use to help teach logical fallacies to my high school debaters. Seriously, thanks. Formally, you're guilty of Tu Quoque, in case you were curious.

I assume that means you're A-OK with the gov't taxing the foods you love or you signing a waiver not to use the public health system?

Yes. The government already taxes junk food (or rather, doesn't give it the same tax break normal food gets), and the rationale is pretty similar.

  • 8 votes
#1.19 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:00 AM EDT
jacq24

The cost of productivity is another issue with smokers. Have you ever entered an office building where their wasn't a collection of addicts hanging out around the front door instead of up in their offices working? My boss hired a business associate's niece for a summer job. The girl is supposed to be helping with my department. Every time I try to talk to her about an assignment she is out puffing or just back from puffing and stinks from it.

  • 4 votes
#1.20 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:03 AM EDT
Pat N

Yes. The government already taxes junk food (or rather, doesn't give it the same tax break normal food gets)

You realize these are two different things, right?

  • 10 votes
#1.21 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:11 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

You realize these are two different things, right?

Nope. Food has isn't taxed, junk food is.

By your logic, we could say that smokers aren't taxed extra; every other item in existence is just given a tax break by virtue of not being a cigarette. The only way you have a point is if there is some sort of 'natural' tax rate which either food or junk food deviate from.

  • 6 votes
#1.22 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:28 AM EDT
Pat N

Nope. Food has isn't taxed, junk food is.

That comment makes no sense. So until you clarify, I'm not touching it.

By your logic, we could say that smokers aren't taxed extra; every other item in existence is just given a tax break by virtue of not being a cigarette.

Actually, that's your argument. You stated that junk food isn't 'really' taxed. It's just not given the same tax breaks/incentives as...say whole foods.

And it's supportive of the original thought put forth in this article. Namely, one can roll their own and not have the taxes. Looking forward to hearing your logic behind that one.

  • 5 votes
#1.23 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:00 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

My point is that there's really no difference between saying that item A is taxed higher than everything else, and saying that everything else is given a tax break item A doesn't receive. You claimed, in your post 1.21, that there is a difference. I've yet to hear it articulated.

But all of this is really a giant non sequitur, because even if we disagree about whether the above is anything more than semantics, it doesn't really touch the central question of whether it makes sense for the government to tax cigarettes. You fixated on a incidental comment in my post that really has very little to do with the actual issue at hand.

Namely, one can roll their own and not have the taxes. Looking forward to hearing your logic behind that one.

Huh? There are a lot of legal ways to avoid paying taxes. That doesn't mean the tax itself is a bad idea. What exactly are you arguing?

  • 7 votes
#1.24 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:06 AM EDT
bonos_rama

People need to fight against gov't intervening in other "vice" areas, too, like marijuana and other drugs. Some people like tobacco to calm them down and give them that little high; some like cocaine or marijuana. In the end, gov't shouldn't have any right to interfere in your pursuit of happiness. Period. Yet there are many smokers who loudly demand their rights while supporting the war on drugs. We have to stop being a nation of hypocrites. And this is coming from a teetotaler who doesn't drink and never inhaled OR exhaled!! I just can't see where our war on drugs has ever gotten us.. prohibition failed, too.

  • 13 votes
#1.25 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:09 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

People need to fight against gov't intervening in other "vice" areas, too, like marijuana and other drugs.

Wait a second. So you wouldn't be in favor of legalizing and then taxing drugs? Because I would be.

I'm not sure the two things you're comparing are really the same.

  • 7 votes
#1.26 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:30 AM EDT
Fufu

You DO realize that obesity related illnesses puts more of a drain on our public health system than smoking does, right? I assume that means you're A-OK with the gov't taxing the foods you love or you signing a waiver not to use the public health system?

Yes, I am perfectly okay with significant taxes on soft drinks, high sugar fruit drinks, and junk food.

Recently, Baltimore and Washington, DC have both been considering taxes on high sugar drinks and some soft drink association has been running a huge commercial campaign against these, portraying them as taxes on poor / working class people. I don't buy that, as the poor / working class are as free to drink water or healthy juices as the rest of us.

I want my state to slap a 50% tax on all drinks that fall above certain levels of sugar and then use that money to fund anti-obesity campaigns and make changes to public school cafeteria menus.

  • 9 votes
#1.27 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:44 AM EDT
fstwarrior

It's interesting Mike that you continue to advocate higher taxes on the smokers and yet you totally avoid the billions of dollars that the government got from their court cases against the tobacco companies that is supposed to be paying for the "damages", hence, supposedly not to raise taxes on the sales of tobacco products. Where has all that money gone? Why isn't it being used for the purposes established?

'Nuther question - do you drink? What would you do if the Feds decided to raise taxes on your alcoholic beverages? I truly hope they do and that it is an astronomical rate. I don't drink and I've had a sister and mother die because of somone else's drinking habits. However I do smoke a pipe and have yet to drive irresponsibly due to my pipe smoking - can a drinker say the same? Doubt it.

  • 12 votes
#1.28 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:47 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

It's interesting Mike that you continue to advocate higher taxes on the smokers and yet you totally avoid the billions of dollars that the government got from their court cases against the tobacco companies that is supposed to be paying for the "damages", hence, supposedly not to raise taxes on the sales of tobacco products.

Wrong. The lawsuit was because the tobacco companies had intentionally lied to the American public about the risks of tobacco use, and the money from the lawsuit went to repairing that damage. Do your research.

Where has all that money gone? Why isn't it being used for the purposes established?

It was.

'Nuther question - do you drink? What would you do if the Feds decided to raise taxes on your alcoholic beverages? I truly hope they do and that it is an astronomical rate. I don't drink and I've had a sister and mother die because of somone else's drinking habits.

I agree. Alcohol should be taxed heavily, like tabacco. I'm interested that your only real standard for what should be taxed is the degree to which you yourself enjoy it.

However I do smoke a pipe and have yet to drive irresponsibly due to my pipe smoking - can a drinker say the same? Doubt it.

I drink, and I never drive afterwards. Nor do my friends. Grow up.

  • 7 votes
#1.29 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:57 AM EDT
Pat N

Yes, I am perfectly okay with significant taxes on soft drinks, high sugar fruit drinks, and junk food.

Define 'junk food'. Sunflower seeds could be considered junk food due to the high sodium content. Vegetable oil could be considered junk food. Anything that's not organic, contains sugar, sodium or preservatives could be considered 'junk food'. Even most meats that you buy at the grocery store could be considered junk food.

I want my state to slap a 50% tax on all drinks that fall above certain levels of sugar and then use that money to fund anti-obesity campaigns

Really? I view that as a waste of taxpayer dollars. You don't think we're in debt enough already? I'm willing to listen though. Show me one anti-anything campaign that's actually worked.

  • 14 votes
#1.30 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:07 AM EDT
CMlawyer

Kjmgirl- smoke all you want to, but PUHLEEZE- keep the obnoxious smoke out of my air (when you are downwind from me on the beach I smell it- YUCK) and keep your cigarette trash inside your car (that's what the ashtray is for) instead of throwing it on the public roadway, and maybe then we can peacefully coexist. Until then, I hope the government keeps taxing you and other smokers to the point that you can no longer afford to smoke.

  • 5 votes
#1.31 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:22 AM EDT
Buzz of the Orient

usa1 and I know that in China it is customary for business people to smoke and drink heavily with each other. China probably holds a record for any country. About a million people a year die here from smoking related diseases. I tell my students that if they want to smoke they deserve a medal from their government, for two reasons. First of all, the Chinese government makes big money from the sale of tobacco/cigarettes, and I mean it is one of the largest sources of income for the government, and as well, it carries out really well the population reducing policies of the government, because when the students smoke they are going to kill themselves and everyone around them who have to breathe their second hand smoke. So they deserve medals because they're heroes to their government.

  • 2 votes
#1.32 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:27 AM EDT
that's Fronk-n-steen!

My wife is a hospice nurse in a southern, eastern state known for its tobacco industry. At least 8 out of 10 of her actively DYING patients are dying from lung cancer or lung disease. Most of them still smoke to this day all the while wondering what is killing them. KJMgirl, you have outwitted the govt. and tobacco companies with your intelligence and resourcefulness. It's a shame that you're just not smart enough to save your own life.

  • 8 votes
#1.33 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:37 AM EDT
Boudicea

that's Fronk - how very judgmental of you! You're acting like no one ever died of cancer without inhaling a few cigarettes. I have news for you - lots of people die from cancer who have never smoked, drank, ate fatty foods or whatever. And I have yet to meet anyone who died healthy.

YOU, sir, have absolutely no right to pass judgment. I'm pretty sure that some day I will die, whether or not I smoke.

  • 22 votes
#1.34 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:41 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

hat's Fronk - how very judgmental of you! You're acting like no one ever died of cancer without inhaling a few cigarettes. I have news for you - lots of people die from cancer who have never smoked, drank, ate fatty foods or whatever.

Ahhh, more logical fallacies... I'm just having a field day now.

To rephrase your argument:

Person 1: People shouldn't drive drunk, because they're more likely to crash.

Person 2: You're totally ignoring the fact that people crash even without drinking. There's nothing wrong with drinking and driving.

YOU, sir, have absolutely no right to pass judgment.

We're not. We're just asking you to repay some of the massive financial burdens you'll place on the rest of us as a result of your drug habit.

  • 8 votes
#1.35 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:48 AM EDT
Phazfun

Mike A,

AZ has a 2% food tax on all food, even fruit. It passed because I voted no and certain people thought a temporary tax would be fine. Honestly I don't think we had a choice even though there was a vote. Arguments for it were as empty like yours for smokers not using a "public health system" if they choose to smoke. People for the tax argued you can afford an extra penny per dollar, which I feel is wrong thinking when it isn't used to it's potential or for the people. No such thing as a temp tax you say? I agree! What are we being punished for along with our 9.3 sales tax. I think I'll move to china with usa1.

Many rights have been lost here with the wrong attitude people have in the US, mainly because of media manipulation to the masses. What public health system is it that you have? A HMO or PPO that is bought separately and has separate group rates for each big profit health insurance company? We are all in this together and all illness' should be cared for, even smokers that use hardly any health services until the end of life problems that happen to all of us. Many non smokers get cancer because of additives processed food manufacturers put into food overwhelming the pancreas with free radicals and toxins not meant for human consumption. That includes fast food which is junk to turkey lunch meat in a deli package.

Once we learn wanting to help all and we are all in this together it won't be getting better here. Those that tax anything and put it in there pockets instead of putting to use where needed are even worse and have a different agenda. We all will feel as if we have been cheated by someone getting more service that you don't pay for because most insurance is private before Medicare. We all will be dying and using Medicare, if it still exists like social security I paid into and will never see. Can you learn to have compassion for the dying no matter what they did or came across in their lifetime? You're paying for fat health problems but don't care as much about those costs or any other just the smokers?

What health problems do smokers go to the doctor for? They need to get a cholesterol lowering drugs daily caused by obesity? They need insulin daily? Please explain what extra health care smokers cost you that obesity, war, alcohol, automobiles and ground beef doesn't cost you?

http://www.annecollins.com/obesity/statistics-obesity.htm

USA Obesity Rates Reach Epidemic Proportions

  • 58 Million Overweight; 40 Million Obese; 3 Million morbidly Obese
  • Eight out of 10 over 25's Overweight
  • 78% of American's not meeting basic activity level recommendations
  • 25% completely Sedentary
  • 76% increase in Type II diabetes in adults 30-40 yrs old since 1990

Obesity Related Diseases

  • 80% of type II diabetes related to obesity
  • 70% of Cardiovascular disease related to obesity
  • 42% breast and colon cancer diagnosed among obese individuals
  • 30% of gall bladder surgery related to obesity
  • 26% of obese people having high blood pressure

According to the post they are taxed $4,062 a year. If we take that amount times how many people smoke, x the population, 19.8% x 308 million = 60,984,000 people who smoke approx. Other sites say more some are less, no one can get the story straight.

Now take 60.984 million people that pay something to society and it goes nowhere, x $4,062 in tax collected, that equals approx $247,717,008,000 a YEAR that's billion with a "B" that smokers generate and your complaining about public health care we use and non smokers contribute nothing in any extra tax? This doesn't include other sin taxes that are not fair to any American. If all the smokers quit they better not raise your taxes or will you be the one saying we need to pay a little extra and can afford that extra penny per dollar?

Don't tax soda, don't tax junk food, don't tax cigarettes, it only makes the government richer and us poorer with no benefits to society because politicians have a different agenda that interpreting the constitution! Even the rest stops on highways have been closed!

Start complaining about the right things, such as where the cigarette tax money goes and we see nothing of it. Our crappy government that is so corrupt they want to impose a North American Union and take our sovereignty away. Let alone the patriot act and the other civil liberty laws over riding the constitution. How many public services were taken from you in your state? Please argue the right argument and help us rather complain about your public health system that really hardly exists needing supplements to offset costs.

  • 13 votes
#1.36 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:58 AM EDT
Boudicea

Mike I haven't placed a single penny of financial burden on anybody. I have my own insurance and I have absolutely NO health problems. I am sick and tired of "you people" accusing us of being "a financial burden". How about all the welfare mothers who have no maternity benefits? How about the illegal immigrants? How about the obese slobs with heart problems? How about alcoholics with liver disease. I'm really tired of this @!$%#! It's all a big bunch of propoganda that you "perfect" people actually believe!

  • 16 votes
#1.37 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:59 AM EDT
fstwarrior

Mike - are you so sardonic that you can't hold a discussion without slight-of-handly downing the other person to prove your superiority?

My father smoked a pack and a half from age 12 until he died at age 81 - no cancer, lung ailments, intestinal malfunctions, colon secure - probably one of the most gentlemen of smokers you'll meet - always asked permission to smoke in "your space" and if it wasn't granted, went outside to enjoy his habit. Smoking was an enjoyment to him and he enjoyed it immensely. There are many, many people who smoke and will never have cancer or any lung impairment. Then again, there are many who will - it is all in the DNA (check out the latest AMA data with google), not totally in the habit. The habit "may" cause the DNA to react earlier, but, the DNA will react and cause the cancer, lung ailments, and other diseases to kick in.

  • 12 votes
#1.38 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:03 AM EDT
Josh of Arc

AZ has a 2% food tax on all food, even fruit. It passed because I voted no and certain people thought a temporary tax would be fine.

Actually, no. That's a county tax. Here in Pima County (Tucson) there is still no sales tax on food.

  • 1 vote
#1.39 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:06 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

Mike - are you so sardonic that you can't hold a discussion without slight-of-handly downing the other person to prove your superiority?

Highlighting people's logical fallacies isn't proving my superiority, it's providing a public service. Hopefully it's helping make them more competent thinkers, as well.

My father smoked a pack and a half from age 12 until he died at age 81 - no cancer, lung ailments, intestinal malfunctions, colon secure

People never seem to get that personal anicdotes don't disprove scientific data. This is like when global warming deniers talk about how "their neighborhood had the most snow ever this winter- global warming must be a lie!"

There are many, many people who smoke and will never have cancer or any lung impairment. Then again, there are many who will - it is all in the DNA (check out the latest AMA data with google), not totally in the habit. The habit "may" cause the DNA to react earlier, but, the DNA will react and cause the cancer, lung ailments, and other diseases to kick in.

Yeah, but smoking still has a huge impact on the likelihood of getting cancer, and we all pay the hospital bills for those smokers.

Mike I haven't placed a single penny of financial burden on anybody. I have my own insurance and I have absolutely NO health problems.

Congrats. Unfortunately, we make policy to take a lot more into consideration than just you and your situation. Not everyone is just like you.

How about all the welfare mothers who have no maternity benefits? How about the illegal immigrants? How about the obese slobs with heart problems? How about alcoholics with liver disease.

Again, you seem unable to grasp that taxing cigarettes does not imply endorsement of other unhealthy lifestyles. Why is this concept so difficult for you?

It's all a big bunch of propoganda that you "perfect" people actually believe!

Wow, you sound really, really bitter. I'm honestly sorry that you feel so strongly about your drug addiction. Remember, the first step is admitting that you have a problem.

  • 7 votes
#1.40 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:06 AM EDT
Boudicea

Mike - Hell YES I'm bitter. I indulge in a completely LEGAL activity and have to listen to bull@!$%# from people like you who think they are somehow superior and who wish to blame all the health insurance problems on smokers.

  • 18 votes
#1.41 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:11 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

Mike - Hell YES I'm bitter. I indulge in a completely LEGAL activity and have to listen to bull@!$%# from people like you who think they are somehow superior and who wish to blame all the health insurance problems on smokers.

Ok. Listen. Smoking is a leading cause of cancer. Many smokers end up being a burden on taxpayers, since critical health care is publicly funded. Acknowledging this does not imply that "all health insurance problems are the fault of smokers." Ok?

Get over your victim mentality. I'm sorry you have a drug habit. So do millions of Americans. One of the prices of your addiction is financial. That's just how it is.

I don't think I'm superior to you. I just don't want to pay for smoker's self- inflicted health issues. That's why I support the cigarette tax forcing them to pay for their own problems.

  • 8 votes
#1.42 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:15 AM EDT
Phazfun

Josh of Arc

Its a tax in AZ, Excuse me for caring as you don't, it still doesn't make it right!

  • 1 vote
#1.43 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:16 AM EDT
Phazfun

Mike A,

Ok. Listen. Smoking is a leading cause of cancer.

See numbers here, you have to download it so I put some of the facts below:

http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/leading-sites-of-new-cancer-cases-and-deaths-2009-estimates

Leading Sites of New Cancer Cases and Deaths – 2009 Estimates

Estimated New Cases*

Male
Prostate
192,280 (25%)
Lung & bronchus
116,090 (15%)

Female
Breast
192,370 (27%)
Lung & bronchus
103,350 (14%)

No use in listening to someone without the facts, Mike, you like faux to get your lies from also? Leading cause of death is lung and bronchus because it isn't as operable. There is a better way to cure cancer, just that the FDA won't except it because it's all natural and makes nothing for drug companies. We do need to think about how many people this earth will support.

There is more to everything if you learn to understand what the agenda is from the "elite".

  • 8 votes
#1.44 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:42 AM EDT
Pat N

Ok. Listen. Smoking is a leading cause of cancer.

I'd like to see proof of this please. Smoking is the leading cause of prostate cancer, huh? Breast cancer? brain tumors? Colon cancer? Skin cancer?

Here's a whole list of cancers

http://www.upmccancercenters.com/cainformation/alltypes.html

You'll note that lung cancer is only one of them. If you're going to run around in this thread and accuse others of 'logical fallicy' (a favorite term for you)...I would suggest you be very, very careful what you put in writing from here on out.

You have the list. You made the comment. Prove that the majority of these cancers are caused by smoking....or you can admit that you are guilty of 'logical fallicy'...which you will never do.

  • 14 votes
#1.45 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:47 AM EDT
Checkmate-983933

Ok. Listen. Smoking is a leading cause of cancer.

Actually, it's now obesity from what I have read.

  • 10 votes
#1.46 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:52 AM EDT
MikeA-1238275

Mike, you like faux to get your lies from also?

That's not even a sentence.

I'd like to see proof of this please. Smoking is the leading cause of prostate cancer, huh? Breast cancer? brain tumors? Colon cancer? Skin cancer?

I said smoking was a leading cause, not the leading cause. In order to be a leading cause of cancer, it is not required that smoking be able to cause all the various types of cancer. Come on. Think harder.

Want numbers?

Compared to nonsmokers, men who smoke are about 23 times more likely to develop lung cancer and women who smoke are about 13 times more likely. Smoking causes about 90% of lung cancer deaths in men and almost 80% in women.

Are you honestly saying that despite causing about 85% of lung cancer deaths, smoking is not a leading cause of cancer?

  • 4 votes
#1.47 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:55 AM EDT
Mary J 0604

Good for you!! I roll them too. :) I can't believe how much money I save. And I actually like them better than my old brand I used to smoke. I've got it down to rolling a pack in less than 3 minutes!! Thanks to the awesome rolling machine! :) I'm with you, I'll quit when I want to quit!!! Great article!! :)

  • 16 votes
#1.48 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:02 PM EDT
Phazfun

The use of MSG is put into foods because it's addictive properties, maybe it's the smokers fault MSG users get cancer also?

Glutamate levels were shown to be high in cancer patients in this study reported in the Oxford Journals.

http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/puramu/fast-food-much-check-out-these-ingredients-at-taco-bell-wendys-more-20263

Hidden MSG?

Regarding MSG, it is helpful to remember this statement from Wikipedia when reading food labels. Under current FDA regulations, when MSG is added to a food, it must be identified as monosodium glutamate in the label's ingredient list. If however MSG is part of a spice mix that is purchased by another company, the manufacturer does not have to list the ingredients of that spice mix and may use the words flavorings or spices. Even food that uses the no msg label may therefore have MSG that is added from a spice mix from another company under current FDA regulations.[9]

  • 6 votes
#1.49 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:04 PM EDT
fstwarrior

Actually, the AMA did a study in 2000 that proved ONLY 3,868 folks died as a result DIRECTY ATTRIBUTABLE to smoking - funny too how the ACS has totally ignored that fact and keeps on throwing out smoking at THE one and only cause of death in the world - ar ar ar ar ar ar

  • 7 votes
#1.50 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:13 PM EDT
Phazfun

MikeA,

HAhahaha,

Mike, you like faux to get your lies from also?

That's not even a sentence.

That's what he remembers and gets out of a reasonable thinking post? Doen't even question facts like we question his, which he has none of. Next case...

He doesn't even know faux = Fox no news not even fair or balanced, it's all lies for the GOP government agenda! Guess he's a well informed American with all he needs to know, just like a teenager knows it all.

That's just scary what Americans don't know because they were so dumbed up.

  • 4 votes
#1.51 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:21 PM EDT
Phazfun

Are you honestly saying that despite causing about 85% of lung cancer deaths, smoking is not a leading cause of cancer?

YES,

As said in post 1.44 right from the American Cancer Society

http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/leading-sites-of-new-cancer-cases-and-deaths-2009-estimates


  • 4 votes
#1.52 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:29 PM EDT
Brian White

Even at the amount that kjmgirl and her husband are spending every year on tobacco taxes, it won't be nearly enough to cover the cost of their medical care that is a direct result of smoking

This is false. The few actual studies on this show that smokers cost less over a lifetime. That is due to them dying early. Caring for the elderly is quite expensive, and getting everyone to quit would result in short term savings, but an increase in spending long-term. Same with obesity.

  • 10 votes
#1.53 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:36 PM EDT
MikeA-1238275

He doesn't even know faux = Fox no news not even fair or balanced, it's all lies for the GOP government agenda! Guess he's a well informed American with all he needs to know, just like a teenager knows it all.

You silly, silly man, I worked on the Obama campaign. Jon Stewart is listed as my religion on facebook. I daresay I'm as well informed as you: I'm going to one of the top five public policy schools in the world, I've worked on five national political campaigns, and I subscribe to the Economist and NYTimes. Come on. Not playing your cute little word games, a la "dumbocrat," "repugnican," "Odumbo," "Buck Fush," or "Faux News," doesn't mean I approve of the subjects. You may think you're being really, really clever, but those phrases don't actually communicate anything, achieve anything, or persuade anyone. So I ignore them.

YES,

Ok. So 90% of lung cancer deaths are caused by smoking. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths a year. Ergo, smoking is a leading cause of cancer. Not the leading cause, but certainly a leading cause.

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/

Continuing denial of this will merely make you look more silly.

  • 4 votes
#1.54 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:36 PM EDT
Lynn3765

CMlawyer..I am with you :) Keep the cig ends in the ashtray instead of all over the road; especially during a hot, dry season where fires are a bigger threat. Don't make me pay for fire damage to my lawn because the smoker was too ignorant not to toss their still lit end out of their window.

I am sick and tired of cleaning up the cig butts that end up in my lawn and on my driveway or worrying about the fact that my lawn could be lit up again when I am not home to be ready with the hose. My yard in no way resembles an ashtray so I don't expect it to be used as one. I also do not appreciate a smoker blowing the smoke in my face as I walk into a store when they are standing directly in front of the door, instead of to the side, to the point I can't get around the smoke being blown out and end up walking through the cloud.

  • 1 vote
#1.55 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:41 PM EDT
Pat N

I said smoking was a leading cause, not the leading cause. Want numbers?

Compared to nonsmokers, men who smoke are about 23 times more likely to develop lung cancer and women who smoke are about 13 times more likely. Smoking causes about 90% of lung cancer deaths in men and almost 80% in women.

Mikey, Mikey, Mikey. In your very own post above, you admit that smoking is a leading cause of LUNG cancer. In other words....you were guilty of 'lolgical fallicy' when you said smoking was a leading cause of cancer, period. Shame on you.

THE leading cause of cancer is genetics. Should we outlaw family? Tax the sick ones, perhaps? Next is obesity. Let's tax everyone who has an elevated BMI. OK? Then we have the fact that there is a higher prostate cancer rate among men who have had vasectomies. I vote we tax penises.

Yep...you stuck your foot in it, hon. You should have specified the TYPE of cancer to avoid 'logical fallicy'.

  • 12 votes
#1.56 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:45 PM EDT
Boudicea

PatN - if we taxed "penises" we'd be collecting an overwhelming majority of that money right in Washington DC

  • 12 votes
#1.57 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:49 PM EDT
MikeA-1238275

Mikey, Mikey, Mikey. In your very own post above, you admit that smoking is a leading cause of LUNG cancer. In other words....you were guilty of 'lolgical fallicy' when you said smoking was a leading cause of cancer, period. Shame on you.

This is almost surreal. If shooting is a leading cause of violent deaths, and violent deaths constitute a large proportion of deaths overall, than shooting is a leading cause of death.

Similarly, if smoking is a leading cause of lung cancer (it is) and lung cancer makes up a large portion of all cancers (it does) then smoking is a leading cause of cancer. What about this is so hard to grasp? And why have you now misspelled fallacy nine times?

Yep...you stuck your foot in it, hon. You should have specified the TYPE of cancer to avoid 'logical fallicy'.

Ten times. There is no fallacy. Smoking causes 90% of lunch cancer, and lung cancer causes about 24% of all cancer. That means smoking causes about 19% of cancer.

Do you seriously believe that causing 1/5 of all cancer is not enough to make smoking a leading cause?

  • 4 votes
#1.58 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
hemphill

This is almost surreal. If shooting is a leading cause of violent deaths, and violent deaths constitute a large proportion of deaths overall, than shooting is a leading cause of death.

This is almost surreal. If water is a leading cause of property damage, and property damage constitute a large proportion of insurance payouts, then water is a leading cause of insurance payouts.

Does it still make sense to you?

  • 4 votes
#1.59 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:29 PM EDT
Rusty in PA

Oh enough already. Smoking is bad for you.

(also THE leading cause of cigarette burns)

  • 4 votes
#1.60 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:34 PM EDT
MikeA-1238275

Does it still make sense to you?

The potential fallacy you're identifying is entirely different from the one Pat thinks s/he's stumbled onto. Pat is claiming that because smoking only causes lung cancer, it is impossible for smoking to be a leading cause of cancer in general.

If water is a leading cause of property damage, and property damage constitute a large proportion of insurance payouts, then water is a leading cause of insurance payouts.

This is a true statement, it's just very vague. Replace water with flooding and you're fine. Regardless, smoking causes about 1/5 of cancer. The fact that all of that 1/5 is lung cancer really is irrelevant. Is 20% not enough to make it a leading cause of cancer?

  • 2 votes
#1.61 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:34 PM EDT
greck

(also THE leading cause of cigarette burns)

and it's the ONLY cause of that a$$hole in front of me at the stoplight flicking his cigarette butt out the window!

  • 4 votes
#1.62 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:44 PM EDT
Pat N

Pat is claiming that because smoking only causes lung cancer, it is impossible for smoking to be a leading cause of cancer in general.

Actually, Pat has asked you to back up your claim that smoking is a leading cause of cancer, period. Thus far, you have failed to do so. Had you said "smoking is a leading cause of LUNG cancer", and had you not been running around the board accusing others of 'logical fallicy' in the process, you wouldn't have heard a peep from me.

But....since you claimed that smoking is a leading cause of cancer in general, and chose to belittle others in the process of making this 'logical fallicy', I am respectfully asking you to put up or shut up. So far, all you've provided is LIKELIHOOD of getting LUNG cancer among smokers. Pretty weak. Or is it a 'logical fallicy'?

  • 10 votes
#1.63 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:03 PM EDT
MikeA-1238275

fallicy

Eleven

fallicy

Twelve

I am respectfully asking you to put up or shut up

1) Smoking causes about 85% of death from lung cancer

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/tobacco/smoking

http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/lung/

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/

2) Lung cancer causes about 28% of all cancer deaths

http://www.lungcancer.org/reading/about.php

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/lung

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/lung-cancer/DS00038

3) Simple division then shows that 23.8% of all deaths from cancer are caused by smoking.

I would say that causing almost a quarter of all deaths from cancer makes smoking a leading cause of death in general, let alone from cancer.

I put up. Happy?

  • 4 votes
#1.64 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:29 PM EDT
Elementofsurprise

RE USA1 in #1.12: They tax cigarettes to balance the equation, although dirty political tactics are bankrupting the good intentions. Statistically, people who smoke are more inclined to become ill. I don't want to get into a pissing contest about numbers, but I don't think a single sole who smokes doesn't read the surgeon general's warning on the side of the pack. That warning was put there because of irrefutable proof that smoking causes cancer. Play games with the numbers and vernacular all you want, but the bottom line is pretty much known to everybody.

I lived overseas for awhile, and in Europe, EVERYBODY smoked. It was the social rage. The people I knew aren't a burden on their health programs, anymore. Two died of emphysema, two died of lung cancer, one died of bladder cancer (also caused by smoking), and one had an attack of asthma and suffocated. The one who died of asthma only inhaled second-hand smoke. She never smoked a single cigarette.

I miss my cigarettes. I wouldn't start again even were I to find the government opted out of profiting off my bad habits because I love being able to breathe.

I find the comparison between food, wine and cigarette taxes absurd. A little wine is HEALTHY to most people. A little nicotine is not. Failing to eat SOME fat and sugar is, likewise, not healthy.

  • 2 votes
#1.65 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:34 PM EDT
Pat N

1) Smoking causes about 85% of death from lung cancer

Again, you are focusing solely on lung cancer and not backing up your original claim that 'smoking is a leading cause of cancer' as a whole.

2) Lung cancer causes about 28% of all cancer deaths

So now were on to cancer deaths? Earlier you said it was 'a leading cause of cancer'. Not cancer deaths. Make up your mind. Lung cancer is essentially incurable regardless of the source. Skin cancer isn't. Wiggling around from 'smoking is a leading cause of cancer'...to 'lung cancer accounts for slightly over 1/4 of all cancer deaths isn't helping you make your point at all.

I supplied you with a list of all the various types of cancer. YOU are the one who made the claim that "smoking is a leading cause of cancer". The only way for you to back up that claim is to go down that list and provide us with the data on what percentage of those cancers are attributed to smoking. If the majority of that list shows that smoking is one of the main contributors to the disease, I'll concede your point. But flipflopping from "smoking is the leading cause of cancer"...to "smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer"...to "smoking is a leading cause of cancer deaths"...isn't doing your original claim (combined with your condescention) any good.

You look wishy-washy. Perhaps the adult thing to do here would be to say: "You're right Pat. I should have clarified my statement better. What I meant to say was...."

  • 8 votes
#1.66 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:47 PM EDT
that's Fronk-n-steen!

MikeA, kindred spirit that you are, you are wasting your time here. We can't save them if they don't want to be saved. Here's to life!!

  • 3 votes
#1.67 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:47 PM EDT
MikeA-1238275

Again, you are focusing solely on lung cancer and not backing up your original claim that 'smoking is a leading cause of cancer' as a whole.

Thus, I labeled it 1). There were 3 separate parts to my argument. Come. On.

If the majority of that list shows that smoking is one of the main contributors to the disease, I'll concede your point.

No, no, no. Let's say there are two types of diseasium, type A and type B. 99% of diseasium is type A, 1% is type B. Type A is caused exclusively by eating cheerios. Type B is caused by many other things.

In the above scenario, eating cheerios causes 99% of diseasium, and therefore, eating cheerios is a leading cause of diseasium. The fact that not all types of diseasium can be caused by eating cheerios doesn't change this.

Come on, man. Think about it.

Is poverty a leading cause of crime? Yes. Is it a leading cause of every single type of crime there is, like insider trading? No.

Is flooding a leading cause of property damage? Yes. Is it the leading cause of every single type of property damage, like fire damage? No.

Is cancer a leading cause of death? Yes. Is it a leading cause of every single type of death, like death by violence? No.

Is smoking a leading cause of cancer? Yes. Is it a leading cause of every single type of cancer, like prostate cancer? No.

  • 2 votes
#1.68 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:59 PM EDT
lib50

I have no problems with paying the (obscenely high) taxes on cigs. It is making me cut down (to conserve) and I hope to quit. I may have to try those electronic cigs though. I know it is an unhealthy habit and does cause health problems. Of course, so do half the things we live with, pollution in the air, on the ground, ingredients in everyday products..... of course nobody wants to admit that, nor pay more for it. Maybe one day.

  • 1 vote
#1.69 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:01 PM EDT
Pat N

Is smoking a leading cause of cancer? Yes. Is it a leading cause of every single type of cancer, like prostate cancer? No.

My point is that lung cancer makes up a very small percentage of all the cancers worldwide. "Cancer" is a generic term used for a large group of diseases that can effect any part of the body. Your logic also fails to take into account that a full 70% of cancer diagnoses occur in developing nations where tobacco usage is extremely low and the diagnosis is attributed to other carcinogenics, genetic history, aflatoxin and aresnic in the water.

Of the main cancer mortality every year:

  • lung (1.3 million deaths/year)
  • stomach (803 000 deaths)
  • colorectal (639 000 deaths)
  • liver (610 000 deaths)
  • breast (519 000 deaths).
  • So while lung cancer is indeed, the number one cancer mortality, the other leaders dwarf the number of deaths caused by lung cancer victims and specifically, lung cancer victims worldwide who are smokers. Therefore, to say that "smoking is a leading cause of cancer" is a fallicy.

    If you would like to meet halfway, concede at least a portion of your statement to reflect: "One of the leading causes of lung cancer in the USA is smoking."...I'll meet you there.

    • 8 votes
    #1.70 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:30 PM EDT
    Hekofawoman

    What really makes me sad about this whole entire topic, is the "blame" game. The only blame there should be placed is on our government for turning over their power to the corps. I am so sick and tired of having every single legal issue on cigerette smoking, nit picked to death, made to make people feel less then, less equipped and less of a person. One of the biggest diseases there is going on right now, far more then cancer or any other disease it HATE. I survived one of the cruelest things that can happen to a human being, the rape of my spirit. So I smoke, so @!$%#ing what. I could have turned out to be a much different person, but I choose not too. Did cigarettes help, you know it. Am I perfect, hell no. But I don't spend my time ruining other people's lives, nor do I condemn those that do whatever they do "responsibly". There are so many illnesses out there draining our system, yet they want to pick on smokers........let me tell you, if I didn't smoke I wouldn't be here now. Sound strong, you betcha. It was afterall a better choice then drugs, booze and being filled with hate towards the world. I am not a victim. I don't play the victim, I work, I can choose what it is I want to spend my money on, while it's still legal, ....oh, that's being taken away too, I forgot. Why don't we worry more about getting the @!$%#s that rome the streets destroying peoples lives under control and then maybe less people will need to find some way to cope. Smoking is a form of coping for me. I am so sick of having my personal life invaded and being judged. I am tired of having people think that we are (the smokers) destroying them. I respect the separate areas, but my God, no one owns the air, rents it or should dictate where I can stand on this earth. Maybe those that don't like it should step back....why do they choose to sit in a smoking area and @!$%#? @!$%# what smoking may or may not do to me, I could, and you've all heard it before "get hit by a car tomorrow". There are more deaths on the road every day that kill many more then cigarettes do. And where I live, we pay taxes on food, everything. The majority of our patients are overweight, far worse. I have insurance, a job, and I am a responsible member of my society. I take care of the poor, the unemployed, the drunks, the obese, the self centered @!$%#s that walk around thinking they are owed....pfffft. And, they have a bad attitude.....all hate. Maybe they should pick up a cigarette instead of shoving 3 pizza's down there throat. But oh no, that would be called discrimination.......well so is what they are doing to smokers. It's all about the money, and that's it. And most of those taxes are going right in the back pocket of some politician that's sitting in his/her cozy office tootin nose candy, watchin kiddy porn, and stealing our money. Self-righteous @!$%#s they are. The saddest part about smoking is, before the government got involved, there were no additives and @!$%#, now look what they've gone and done. I really don't care if any of you agree with me or not.....it's just my perspective, and my opinion. I like them, I'll continue to smoke them, and I guess, I'll get locked up for them someday....that's what they want anyway - more control. I can see right through their @!$%#ing lies. They don't give a @!$%# about any of us......it's all about them. When we ever stop allowing the very principles of what is happening to this county happen, slowly but surely, we are all doomed. Hey I thought we were against communism, guess not. I am. Seems like everything we've done to be where we are has bit us right in the ass. Power corrupts, it turns on you, and that it what truly destroys us, not cigarettes. OMG. Oh, and I've had cancer before, 12 years ago....and it had nothing to do with cigerettes. Hek (yea, I'm just an average citizen, but I ain't stupid) and I could go on, and on and on, but I won't. I'm so frustrated watching the whole show go on in front of me every day at work.....it's all so clear, why can't people see this? I'm sad, really sad.

    PayN - Your my Hero right now. Keep fighting the good fight, you say it better then I could ever express. Thank you. And thank you Kjmgirl again for this article. It's about time it's been addressed. There is far more at stake here then cigs.

    • 14 votes
    #1.71 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:12 PM EDT
    roketboy

    Cigs are like the middle class citizens, just another place the FEDS can dip into for more money whenever they want. Cigs are bad-why are they still around-huh?

    • 7 votes
    #1.72 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:13 PM EDT
    Hekofawoman

    Yea, makes you wonder....or at least that's what they want to do....make every one so freakin confused we don't know our ass from our "brand" To hell with that. Thanks for your comment. I thought I'd be pummeled by now....but whatever. It's just a view of what I see as a reality. Hek

    You know what I find really ironic....I spent 4 @!$%#ing hours at my doctor's appt. today....why? Cause he wants to run every freaking test there is, every time I go, looking for something to be wrong. I'm almost fifty and going strong, no complaints, never have, yet he finds I must spend once every three months going through a battery of test to "find" something. I got mad at him today and told him "quit trying to paint that devil on the wall while you milk my insurance". Make sure you use it all up, so someday when I do get sick, naturally, I won't have any. Jerk, I fired him today. He doesn't care about me, he cares about himself.

    • 13 votes
    #1.73 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:35 PM EDT
    PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
    Pat N

    we are human and some folks fail to remember those two facts thinking they are entitled to disrespect smokers as well treat us anyway they please.

    Yep to both of you.

    I don't run around belittling people who don't eat right (yes...I've used it as an example in this thread, but only as an example) I don't care if people eat Twinkies. I don't care if they find joy and comfort in it. I'm stuck paying for there health problems, but it is what it is.

    It's when people turn their nose up and start acting holier-than-thou about my vices that I get my hackles up. My vices are no more their concern than their vices are mine. The worst of the pack are the ex-smokers that suddenly take an overzealous approach and seem to have forgotten that they are usually the same people who support an American's right to do whatever they want as long as it's legal.

    • 11 votes
    #1.75 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:11 PM EDT
    Hekofawoman

    PNV - My dear, dear friend....don't you worry, no one "dumps" that @!$%# on me..ever again. I'm done but being a bleeding heart......I'm all about leave me the @!$%# alone....I never did anything to you..........ya know?

    You must have missed my lastest article....can't even go shopping without being accousted by some pervert...yea, they are everywhere..........and they are worried about cigs....Go figure. My daughter and her husband have since bought me a gun and I PLAN on using it if necessary......without hesitation. The laws have changed here now, I can shoot him through the door...Thank God!

    Good to see you my dear friend, hope you doing well! Hekkie

    • 8 votes
    #1.76 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:19 PM EDT
    Hekofawoman

    Ahhhhh, dammit PNV, you just touched my soft spot...I know you get it. It all, freaking breaks my heart what you endure...........I can't stand it~ love to you always, and my friendship., You know PNV, I'm a really stong gal...it breaks my heart that I can't do more....no one will let me, least they think me crazy, but I'm a working on it..lol - as if. Hekkie (I can fool the lot with my blondness and I will) a promice I intend to keep to my death!!!!

    • 8 votes
    #1.77 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:32 PM EDT
    Hekofawoman

    I'm not political,as you know, but I do have my passions, they are far more persuasive then any one could say, or do:) Hek

    • 7 votes
    #1.78 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:38 PM EDT
    Demosthene

    I hope you don't have children. I'm in the process of watching my mother-in-law slowly die of COPD. My dad and two uncles died of COPD. A cousin and a good friend died of lung cancer.

    Keep thinning out the gene pool, just stay away from the rest of us while you do it.

    • 1 vote
    #1.79 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:56 PM EDT
    Brite

    Niiiiiiiiiiiiice... but thanks... I have 6 kids... and 5 grand kids... and I smoke and I vote. But thanks so much for playing our game.

    • 5 votes
    #1.80 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:59 PM EDT
    hemphill

    My favorite response to the think of the children argument was made by an 80 year old lady in a waffle house. Some were down from new york and were stunned that we allowed smoking inside. They made the 'think of the children' comment and she just looked at them and said; None of mine ever had problems. Perhaps its just poor stock.

    I still wonder if the couple knew they had been insulted.

    • 8 votes
    #1.81 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:16 PM EDT
    Hekofawoman

    hemphill - LMAO (and I love your name)lol

    • 7 votes
    #1.82 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:25 PM EDT
    hemphill

    it's just my name. It's on my birth certificate...

    • 5 votes
    #1.83 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:32 PM EDT
    Boudicea

    hemphill - Where's the birth certificate? Hehehehe

    • 6 votes
    #1.84 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:44 PM EDT
    hemphill

    You can find it in the county clerks office in Clarksville TN.

    • 5 votes
    #1.85 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:00 PM EDT
    Dave 49

    They raise the price to discourage new smoker's(The Young) Not the addicts They figure a bit of time and allot of smokes will take care of you..P.S. I hope your not the type of person who will be ALL for smoking and then when you get cancer you try to sue the tobacco company's

      #1.86 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:09 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Dave - Nope. It's all about personal responsibility

      • 6 votes
      #1.87 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:10 PM EDT
      Dave 49

      Thanks Kjmgirl You break it you bought it is my motto

      • 1 vote
      #1.88 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:13 PM EDT
      Mary J 0604

      You can find it in the county clerks office in Clarksville TN.

      I thought Hemphill was going to say Hawaii!! ;p

      • 7 votes
      #1.89 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:14 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Rhazes

      They raise the price to discourage new smoker's(The Young) Not the addicts

      No thats BS, they are doing it for the money because cigarettes are addictive.

      In just a few years cigarettes went from $2.25 a pack to $6 which was $180 a month for me for premium smokes in Michigan. In January I started buying smokes from an Indian reservations and getting my costs back down less than $2.00 a pack.

      The federal government doesn't like Americans buying stuff from the Indians so they passed the PACT Act.

      I decided to roll my own which was very cheap and cut my cost to $40 a month but it was a pain in the ass and I hated doing it after 2 months of it I quit cold turkey.

      I love smoking and miss it but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay outrageous taxes. If people had to pay $4.50 per meal or 6 pack for fast food and alcohol the country would riot.

      Next thing to quit is cable tv $37.00 last month in Fees and taxes.

      Enough is Enough

      • 4 votes
      #1.91 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:30 AM EDT
      Rixar13

      I understand every-ones complaint and always vote for all my friends but, I have given up the fight and quit cigarettes 2 months and 19 days ago... Smile :-)

      • 8 votes
      #1.92 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:44 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Rixar - good for you!!! Keep on countin!

      • 5 votes
      #1.93 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:58 PM EDT
      Kshark

      Pat N-

      Can you get second-had obesity from sitting next to an obese person like you can get second-hand smoke from smokers?

      • 3 votes
      #1.94 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 9:05 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Can you get second-had obesity from sitting next to an obese person

      I'm assuming that was a rhetorical question.

      Of course I can't. I am however, forced to pay their healthcare expenses. Especially now that the unconstitutional federal healthcare mandate has passed. Studies show that there is a correlation between poverty and obesity. It's also worth noting that the obese place a greater burden on our healthcare system:

      http://www.allbusiness.com/accounting/1086324-1.html

      Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States and is disproportionately concentrated in poor populations.

      Smokers, regardless of income, are currently paying for a huge portion of the strain they put on the healthcare system through 125% taxes on the product.

      Are the obese, regardless of income, willing to do the same thing on their Big Macs, Twinkies and Doritos?

      Then of course, we have the antecdotal stories. Like the thin woman who was recently booted off a Southwest flight to make room for an obese 14 year old that couldn't fit in one seat...and didn't pay for two seats. I'd say that thin lady was affected by "second-hand obesity"...wouldn't you?

      • 5 votes
      #1.95 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 9:49 PM EDT
      Fellow NoName

      Then of course, we have the antecdotal stories. Like the thin woman who was recently booted off a Southwest flight to make room for an obese 14 year old that couldn't fit in one seat...and didn't pay for two seats. I'd say that thin lady was affected by "second-hand obesity"...wouldn't you?

      Soon there will be THIRD HAND obesity!!!

      • 2 votes
      #1.96 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 10:38 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Soon there will be THIRD HAND obesity!!!

      FNN...you really gotta quit with the zingers. I was in the middle of taking a sip of hot chocolate when I read this. Hot chocolate out the nose is NOT a pleasant experience. =D

      • 3 votes
      #1.97 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 10:43 PM EDT
      Brite

      It's easier than say.... Coke or OJ out of the nose...

      • 2 votes
      #1.98 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 10:51 PM EDT
      Kshark

      Pat N--

      So you are complaining about obesity, which I admit is a problem, and everyone has to pay for it, but apparently no issues with smokers, who not only get cancer and other illnesses themselves, but they then make others sick with second hand smoke, and thus you have more people to add to the healthcare list.

      And mind you no, I certainly am not for this crappy healthcare thing either.

      But obesity you have one person to where that obesity does not inflict harm onto others making them sick, true others, those not obese would pay for the problems, but then smokers, you have the smoker themselves getting sick, then you have the non-smokers that also get sick so there are more people that would be paid for with the healthcare.

      Though it is downright strange as can be that the poor would be more obese, as claimed in your link, when they are poor, how would they afford food.

      • 1 vote
      #1.99 - Mon Aug 2, 2010 12:42 AM EDT
      Pat N

      But obesity you have one person to where that obesity does not inflict harm onto others making them sick, true others, those not obese would pay for the problems, but then smokers, you have the smoker themselves getting sick, then you have the non-smokers that also get sick so there are more people that would be paid for with the healthcare.

      No one is going to say smoking is healthy. Smokers DO pay for their own healthcare. At least, that's the excuse we're given for all of the taxes that are implemented on cigarettes. Name one other product where the taxes are higher than the actual cost of the product. The obese don't pay for the strain they put on the medical system through their taxes. I end up paying for it and obesity puts a greater strain on our healthcare system that the problems caused by smoking...first hand or second hand.

      Though it is downright strange as can be that the poor would be more obese, as claimed in your link, when they are poor, how would they afford food.

      Not strange at all. There has been study after study that shows people tend to buy according to income. For an upper middle class person, thats fresh berries, lean meats and whole grains. For the poor, that's anything off the Dollar Menu at McDonalds, Mac & Cheese and a lot of processed foods.

      Now the argument people will have is: "People shouldn't have to pay for their obesity through taxes on food! They have to eat poorly because it's cheaper!" To which I call BS. A person can make three meals off of one chicken. Whole grain noodles are cheap. The list goes on and on.

      • 4 votes
      #1.100 - Mon Aug 2, 2010 7:44 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Kshark - obesity kills, leaving minor children without parents. You think THAT doesn't affect our society? How about all those kids collecting their daddy's social security from age 1 to age 18?

      • 4 votes
      #1.101 - Mon Aug 2, 2010 10:57 AM EDT
      kayci

      Obesity! OOF!

      They are making the junk fat science using the junk tobacco science as a model.

      Second Hand Obesity. Guess we better work on a propaganda program calling for the denormalizing, marginalization, over-taxation and shunning of fat people.

      http://www.ehow.com/how_4789967_avoid-catching-obesity.html

      • 3 votes
      #1.102 - Tue Aug 3, 2010 4:32 PM EDT
      Reply
      Atsidi

      Puts a whole new light on that little garden out by the fence.

      • 8 votes
      #2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:33 PM EDT
      HunterHawke

      I've heard growing tobacco (the currently legal kind, not the funny stuff that makes people even happier), is really difficult. I haven't tried, but I've pondered the idea of trying to grow my own tobacco and then follow kjmgirl's path and roll my own. It's a lot of work, but a little hard work never hurt anyone, and it would save tons of money.

      • 10 votes
      #2.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:39 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Hunter - the new rolling machines are fool-proof. I tried those $5 things, but it was a waste of money, tobacco and tubes

      • 9 votes
      #2.2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:15 PM EDT
      Jimster

      Yeah cause you want to get the best deal you can when you're trying to kill yourself.

      Those taxes are going for programs to promote anti-smoking campaigns. We don't need more addictsAt least your not supporting the major tobacco campanies any longer by rolling your own. I'll grant you that.

      But here's an idea, why don't you do yourself a favor and just quit? That's the cheapest option for a whole host of reasons AND you get to taste food again, not wake up hacking, or not die a needless and horrible death

      I lost my father to smoking. It took a long time, and it wasn't pretty.

      • 8 votes
      #2.3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:01 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Jimster - did you ever try to quit smoking? I have and I have NOT been successful It's more addictive than heroin. IF you think that my bad habit should go to support other people, then that is your problem.

      • 18 votes
      #2.4 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:17 PM EDT
      Brian White

      Those taxes are going for programs to promote anti-smoking campaigns

      No. You're thinking of the big class action lawsuits of a decade ago. The taxes are mostly city/state taxes that go to the general fund - building roads, schools, the kind of things that everyone is supposed to pay for.

      • 12 votes
      #2.5 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:04 PM EDT
      BIGTIMEj

      brian, acttually the federal do go to chip programs, state taxes vary state by state.

      • 2 votes
      #2.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:59 AM EDT
      Jimster

      It i very difficult, but it can be done. My wife did it 25 years ago. She followed the American Lung Assoc. program.

      I'll be the toughest, yet the most rewarding thing you'll ever do.

      Good luck.

      • 3 votes
      #2.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:02 AM EDT
      Pat N

      Jimster -

      Couple of things.

      1) Lets say you love Life Savers. The Wild Berry kind. You have a 'habit' of popping one in your mouth about every 1/2 hour and savoring it. Life Savers are perfectly legal, right? Yet everywhere you go, you're met with little signs saying "Thank you for not eating Life Savers". You're on an 8 hour flight without your Life Savers, and when you finally land, you have to go outside to have a Life Savers. And then....you have to go to a little area designated for Life Savers eating with all of the other Life Savers pariahs. Someone says to you: "Just quit. You're killing yourself with all that sugar and those preservatives! Afterall, obesity issues cause more of a drain on our healthcare system than smoking issues."

      2) If the government is taxing the hell out of cigarettes in order to fund smoking related illnesses and anti-smoking campaigns...if they know it's so bad for people, then why do they make it legal for 18 year olds to buy a pack of cigarettes yet that same person can't buy a beer or pull the handle on a slot machine until they're 21?

      • 16 votes
      #2.8 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:08 AM EDT
      bonos_rama

      , then why do they make it legal for 18 year olds to buy a pack of cigarettes yet that same person can't buy a beer or pull the handle on a slot machine until they're 21?

      More unconstitutionality. If a person is a legal adult at 18 (and they are), they should be able to smoke, drink, gamble, or do anything else that is legal in this country, period. Our rights have been whittled away to the point where we are going to lose them all one day.

      • 18 votes
      #2.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:13 AM EDT
      Pat N

      More unconstitutionality. If a person is a legal adult at 18 (and they are), they should be able to smoke, drink, gamble, or do anything else that is legal in this country, period.

      I agree. An 18 year old can volunteer to go to Afghanistan and risk their life for the country, but they can't crack open a beer.

      Helmet laws. Seatbelt laws. Different age laws for vices like gambling, drinking and smoking. In their overzealousness to protect people from themselves, the government has contradicted itself consistently, going with the 'feel-good' legislation of the day and as a result, whittled away the rights of Americans to chose right or wrong and accept the consequences of their own actions.

      • 16 votes
      #2.10 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:14 AM EDT
      Jimster

      Pat-

      First thanks for the analogy, it really does help on these discussion to be able look at things differently.

      No analogy is perfect, but let's try to make it more er...analogous to smoking.

      Let's suppose that eating Life Savers, besides providing pleasure and any health down-sides, also effects those in the vicinity of the consumer of them. Let's say a diabetic who sits nearby gets a sugar jolt along with a disruption of their blood sugar levels that hastens the on-set of diabetic complications. Or perhaps the sugar in the Life Savers causes tooth decay in those nearby.

      This to me is closer to what smoking in public is like. It makes smoking (anything) different than any other unhealthful activity.

      I realize that some situations are more intense than others in terms of contact with 2nd hand smoke, i.e elevators, or office space as opposed to an outdoor cafe or a baseball stadium, but in general, smoking effects those around the smoker in unhealthful ways.

      The other unique thing about smoking is that it cannot be considered any part of a necessity like eating can. Even though one can eat unhealthful foods, the action of doing so is at least part of life sustaining action (albeit gone wrong perhaps).

      So smoking sits in the position where some drugs are; they provide pleasure to the user, they impact the users health in some way, and it can cause social friction or strain on health services.

      But smoking cigarettes is almost unique in it's ability to inflict direct health dangers to those merely in the proximity of it's user.Those who decide to not take the risk of smoking can have that decision thwarted by those who do decide to take the risks. Smokers should not have the right to place others at risk for their pursuit of pleasure. Period.

      Because of these impacts, smokers must chip in to the kitty to mitigate the social and health impacts caused by their use of tobacco because it is purely voluntary activity that causes direct health risks to others.

      • 6 votes
      #2.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:03 AM EDT
      Checkmate-983933

      "Those taxes are going for programs to promote anti-smoking campaigns."

      Not in RI they're not. The taxes go to roadwork (can't say what the alcohol tax goes to). It was a big thing in RI a few years back because everyone thought that the taxes were going for hospitals, etc.

      • 4 votes
      #2.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:01 PM EDT
      Brian White

      brian, acttually the federal do go to chip programs, state taxes vary state by state.

      SCHIP is not anti-smoking programs. It is another example of a general purpose program (children's insurance for the poor) that should be distributed equally across tax payers. There is no logical reason smokers should be the only ones paying for an expansion of poor children's insurance.

      • 4 votes
      #2.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:41 PM EDT
      Demosthene

      Cigarette taxes should not go to hospitals. They should be used for things that benefit all of us.

      As for quitting, if you can't quit I have no respect for you. I consider you weak and a drain on the rest of society.

      • 1 vote
      #2.14 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:59 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Demosthene - Boy you're tough. Frankly, I don't have a lot of use here in this seed for those whose main goal is to insult. If you have something of value to say regarding the taxation issue, feel free. If not I respectfully request that you simply bypass this thread. Smokers deal with insults from the ignorant and uninformed on a daily basis. They dont' need it here as well.

      May I also just remind you of one fairly famous quote "He that is without sin among you, Let him first cast a stone."

      • 10 votes
      #2.15 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:06 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Cigarette taxes should not go to hospitals. They should be used for things that benefit all of us.

      Huh? Hospitals don't benefit all of us?

      • 9 votes
      #2.16 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:28 PM EDT
      kaviaq

      As for quitting, if you can't quit I have no respect for you. I consider you weak

      I think you are forgetting that cigarettes are more addictive than crack. They aren't weak because they have a hard time quitting. Their biochemistry is driving them to have more nicotine. There are few things in life as difficult as overcoming an addiction.

      • 8 votes
      #2.17 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:42 PM EDT
      Brite

      As for quitting, if you can't quit I have no respect for you.

      It's OK... I have no respect for you either...

      • 9 votes
      #2.18 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:49 PM EDT
      Mrs D-1475814

      There are few things in life as difficult as overcoming an addiction.

      While I totally agree with your comment, I will have to disagree for another reason. As a smoker, it seems the biggest addiction today to overcome are those who feel self righteous over not just smokers but, any individual who do not adhere to their concept of "you're not living your life according to my standards". JMT

      • 10 votes
      #2.19 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:49 PM EDT
      Pat N

      it seems the biggest addiction today to overcome are those who feel self righteous over not just smokers but, any individual who do not adhere to their concept of "you're not living your life according to my standards". JMT

      Outstanding observance!

      • 6 votes
      #2.20 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:52 PM EDT
      Brite

      it seems the biggest addiction today to overcome are those who feel self righteous over not just smokers but, any individual who do not adhere to their concept of "you're not living your life according to my standards". JMT

      Outstanding observance!

      BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • 6 votes
      #2.21 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:55 PM EDT
      mtherof3

      it seems the biggest addiction today to overcome are those who feel self righteous over not just smokers but, any individual who do not adhere to their concept of "you're not living your life according to my standards". JMT

      Outstanding observance!

      BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Here, here!!!

      • 6 votes
      #2.22 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:27 PM EDT
      Rhazes

      did you ever try to quit smoking? I have and I have NOT been successful It's more addictive than heroin. IF you think that my bad habit should go to support other people, then that is your problem.

      Roll your own for 2 months and you might be able to quit cold turkey. When I rolled my own the first week or so I doubled my smoking because of all the missing chemicals. After about 2 months I just got tired of rolling my own and quit. I still miss my Marlboro Reds and I love smoking but Michigan and Feds can blow me.

      • 8 votes
      #2.23 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:28 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Rhazes - I hear ya, that was funny for being true:)

      • 6 votes
      #2.24 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:12 AM EDT
      Kshark

      Pat N and bonos_rama--

      More unconstitutionality. If a person is a legal adult at 18 (and they are), they should be able to smoke, drink, gamble, or do anything else that is legal in this country, period.

      I agree. An 18 year old can volunteer to go to Afghanistan and risk their life for the country, but they can't crack open a beer.

      Since bonos was along the same lines, why not include just one post.

      Anyway, you two really want to talk about the difference between mind altering substances and joining the military after having much training? really? Sorry those 18 is an adult excuses are really bogus.

      Never minding the fact that peoples' choices affect others so if someone wants to @!$%# up their own lives in the safety of their own homes, go for it, no one will stop them, but the problem is interaction with other people in the country. You two forget about that one.

      • 1 vote
      #2.25 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 9:14 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Anyway, you two really want to talk about the difference between mind altering substances and joining the military after having much training?

      Referring to my portion of the post only:

      I have a daughter in her 8th week of basic training. She graduates in one week. She could concievably find herself in Afghanistan in two weeks. I'm shocked (and saddened) that you feel 9 weeks training is adequate for sending 18 year olds into a war zone. My feeling is that NO AMOUNT of training could prepare a person for that kind of experience.

      Now...regarding the "mind altering substance" part of your post: An 18 year old can go to the store and buy Ny-Quil. Or Tylenol PM. Or No-Doz. Or Unisom. All mind altering substances. Do you advocate banning those products being sold to legal adults too?

      • 4 votes
      #2.26 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 10:03 PM EDT
      Fellow NoName

      Tylenol PM

      @!$%# I got stories with that! LOL

      • 1 vote
      #2.27 - Sun Aug 1, 2010 10:39 PM EDT
      Reply
      WILDWONDERFUL

      You can also buy cigarettes from the Indians much cheaper.

      • 6 votes
      Reply#3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:56 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      WildWonderful - as of 6/30/10 it is illegal for cigarettes to be shipped through the mail. Also, if you buy them from the Indians, you must still send the State of PA $16.20 PER CARTON in excise taxes. How do I know this? They sent me a bill for $3,200 after my credit card company gave the state my name and history of purchases.

      • 12 votes
      #3.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:13 PM EDT
      WILDWONDERFUL

      khmgirl

      Wow you do live in one greedy state. Just curious how did the credit card company have the right to give out the history of your purchases ?

      • 7 votes
      #3.2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:21 PM EDT
      ebookout

      khmgirl

      It's called using cash ,unless they write you name done no trace.

      Also someone mentioned growing your own. It' not that hard and it grows fast. Hi grade seeds on internet ,just need a pot and some dirt and you got a plant. One plant makes a lot of cigs.

      • 6 votes
      #3.3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:39 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      WILD - Big Brother required the credit card companies to provide the information or lose their right to do business in this state.

      • 12 votes
      #3.4 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:45 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      mightyj

      In Gloucester they nailed the American Legion for selling ciggarettes from the reservation. JJ

      • 9 votes
      #3.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:10 AM EDT
      bonos_rama

      Also someone mentioned growing your own. It' not that hard and it grows fast. Hi grade seeds on internet ,just need a pot and some dirt and you got a plant. One plant makes a lot of cigs.

      Until the gov't decides to add that to the list of things they empower cops to kick your door in for. Like marijuana growing, which hurts no one.

      • 12 votes
      #3.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:15 AM EDT
      lib50

      They sent me a bill for $3,200 after my credit card company gave the state my name and history of purchases.

      Holy @!$%#. Maybe its a good thing I buy locally.

      • 2 votes
      #3.8 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:03 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      lib - you have to buy locally now. Big Brother just made it illegal for cigarettes to be sent through the US Postal Service. If that isn't a crock of @!$%# I don't know what is

      • 9 votes
      #3.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:08 PM EDT
      Elementofsurprise

      kmj: You have every right to load tar into your lungs. I did it for years and ... ahhhh ... that feeling just can't be matched! Add a glass of wine to it, and I even liked my kids!

      When I smoked, back when it was still politically correct, I asked people if they minded when I smoked near them. I never smoked in my apartment because I didn't have good ventilation. I didn't ALWAYS want to smell smoke. I also smoked back when asking to bum a tubie wasn't akin to requesting a kidney. They were cheap. If more people remember that smoke bothers some people terribly, I doubt this whole issue would have erupted.

      Nah, I keep forgetting that whole wantie-takie thing the government has going for it.

      Since I AM now smoke free (and I compare the quitting task to experiencing 9 months of raging PMS), I DO notice I a) walk farther without gasping b) smell prettier c) like food (goodbye, waist line!) and d) have fewer bronchial issues. I also know my wallet has change at the end of the work week.

      When you light up, I'll stand by you if you're outside. That light waft of fresh air mixed with my favorite toxins is hard to resist. If you're inside, I'll thank you to put it out.

      Since I quit smoking and now love food, I have planted a garden to get the best bang for my buck. Though slightly thick in the middle, I am willing to do what it takes to enjoy my newfound bad habit without purging my retirement fund. I believe all smokers should have that same right.

      • 11 votes
      #3.10 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:46 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      If everyone thought the way you did we smokers would not be pariahs and the government would not DARE tax our "product" 125%. Thank you for your kind words and logical stand on the issue.

      • 9 votes
      #3.11 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:55 PM EDT
      Reply
      Joanna Caroll

      Smokers - Fight Back!

      I know you know this but it's considered a sin tax - they want you to quit.

      • 4 votes
      #4 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:12 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Yeah, I called it a sin tax in my article. AND I will quit when I decide to quit. It's none of their business what I do with my body. Maybe I don't consider it a "sin".

      • 21 votes
      #4.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:14 PM EDT
      Rusty in PA

      Why is it legal for a woman to have a choice with her own body when it comes to abortion but not when it comes to smoking?

      Maybe there should be a "sin tax" on abortion. Oh, wait PA has taken federal money to fund abortion, but is taxing smokers to "help" them quit.

      • 4 votes
      #4.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:32 AM EDT
      TheJonesGirl

      I've never heard of damage due to secondhand abortions.

      A person is welcome to smoke, in his/her own home with the windows shut. So long as that home isn't connected to another's home, where the fumes can waft through ventilation systems and the walls.

      • 8 votes
      #4.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:36 AM EDT
      MikeA-1238275

      Why is it legal for a woman to have a choice with her own body when it comes to abortion but not when it comes to smoking?

      You have the choice to smoke. You simply don't have the choice to impose your smoking on other people.

      • 8 votes
      #4.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:43 AM EDT
      Rusty in PA

      You have the choice to smoke. You simply don't have the choice to impose your smoking on other people.

      The Government tax has no bearing on where people smoke, or around whom people smoke.

      By using these taxes the Government is saying "abortion good. smoking bad."

      • 3 votes
      #4.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:47 AM EDT
      Pat N

      I've never heard of damage due to secondhand abortions.

      Secondhand abortions? Okkkkaaay. Whatever, jonesy. I think I know what you were trying to say with your...um...attempted 'wit', though.

      Going with your logic, then the dad, the grandparents, other siblings, etc., should have to give permission for the abortion. Afterall, the abortion affects those people and potentially, negatively...right?

      A person is welcome to smoke, in his/her own home with the windows shut.

      Great. Then a person is welcome to wear perfume or cologne in their home with the windows shut. Some people are allergic. Others might even suffer an asthma attack from someones 'second hand perfume'.

      • 18 votes
      #4.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:25 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      To the jones girl - It's SO magnanimous of you to allow ME to smoke in MY home with the windows shut! Only YOU could be so arrogant as to assume that you own the air!

      • 15 votes
      #4.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:43 AM EDT
      Longhorn78759

      Only YOU could be so arrogant as to assume that you own the air!

      Yes JonesGirl, you arrogant cow. How dare you demand clean air? How dare you demand the right to not inhale someone's smoke?????

      • 7 votes
      #4.8 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:53 AM EDT
      mightyj

      kjm- It should be possible to buy air soon, when they put the cap on trade. JJ

      • 8 votes
      #4.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:54 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Longhorn - smart a$$ trolling calls for smart a$$ response. Please take ALL cars off the road in California - they pollute MY air. Please close down ALL factories - they pollute MY air. Please withdraw all perfumes, after-shaves, etc from the market - they pollute MY air....

      • 14 votes
      #4.10 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:09 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Longhorn - smart a$$ trolling calls for smart a$$ response. Please take ALL cars off the road in California - they pollute MY air. Please close down ALL factories - they pollute MY air. Please withdraw all perfumes, after-shaves, etc from the market - they pollute MY air....

      While your smokes pollute your lungs. Makes a whole lotta sense, there.

      • 5 votes
      #4.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:38 PM EDT
      Brian White

      Yes JonesGirl, you arrogant cow. How dare you demand clean air? How dare you demand the right to not inhale someone's smoke?????

      And would you be happy with a government proposal that you be allowed to drive your car all you want - inside your house with the windows closed? Car exhaust demonstrably hurts many more people than secondhand smoke.

      • 8 votes
      #4.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:44 PM EDT
      Pat N

      While your smokes pollute your lungs. Makes a whole lotta sense, there.

      If what I chose to do with my lungs is any of your concern, then what some other woman choses to do with her uterus must be of my concern, right?

      • 14 votes
      #4.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:50 PM EDT
      bonos_rama

      Why is it legal for a woman to have a choice with her own body when it comes to abortion but not when it comes to smoking?

      And why should it NOT be legal for her to have a choice with her own body in BOTH cases, Rusty? Or are you taking a hypocritical stance here in wanting gov't our of YOUR lungs but up in HER crotch?

      • 5 votes
      #4.14 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
      Mary J 0604

      If what I chose to do with my lungs is any of your concern, then what some other woman choses to do with her uterus must be of my concern, right?

      Perfectly stated Pat!!!! :) I would vote for this to be comment of the day!! :) (If they had one. :)

      • 13 votes
      #4.15 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:55 PM EDT
      Rusty in PA

      Bonos - I was simply using the argument I hear all the time from the pro-choice movement that it is the woman's body, therefore the woman's choice. They say that the government shouldn't interfere with that choice.

      Using that logic, if one chooses to smoke (regardless of the health effects), shouldn't the government stay out of that as well? They are trying to make that choice for the smoker via large sin taxes. I would argue that this amounts to government interference.

      And why should it NOT be legal for her to have a choice with her own body in BOTH cases, Rusty?

      I never said that it should or shouldn't be legal for her to have a choice. I disagree with the government funding abortion on one hand and taxing cigarettes on the other. I don't ask for federal money to buy cigarettes (I'm not even a smoker, but I wouldn't ask for the money if I was)

      • 4 votes
      #4.16 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:15 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      If what I chose to do with my lungs is any of your concern, then what some other woman choses to do with her uterus must be of my concern, right?

      It seems you missed the point.

      It's totally your concern. Go ahead and pollute your lungs all you want. My comment was in response to a prior comment where she sarcastically suggested not putting other pollutants in the air. What kind of sense does that make? Complaining about environmental pollution while you purposely pollute your own lungs? It's nonsensical and doesn't help her point.

      Perfectly stated Pat!!!! :) I would vote for this to be comment of the day!! :)

      Anyone who would vote this up as the comment of the day isn't thinking very well. Perhaps its all the plaque built up in the brain as a result of smoking.

      • 4 votes
      #4.17 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:14 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      JaneinthisWorld - you did miss the point. Smokers are accused of killing people with second hand smoke (air pollution) but cars (which put FAR more dangerous chemicals into the air) are just fine. right? I don't think so. Maybe the government should require that everyone go back to horse & buggies.

      • 8 votes
      #4.18 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:19 PM EDT
      Mary J 0604

      Anyone who would vote this up as the comment of the day isn't thinking very well. Perhaps its all the plaque built up in the brain as a result of smoking.

      *exhaling smoke* Or perhaps it just that I'm not a person who seems to have a stick up my ass while spewing self righteous bull@!$%#. :) Maybe you should take up smoking...it's very relaxing. :) I'm sure all that tension you are feeling is pretty bad for your health. :) Have a great day!! :) I know I will. :)

      It seems you are the one who missed the point.

      • 10 votes
      #4.19 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:23 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Mary J - FR on the way

      • 7 votes
      #4.20 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:28 PM EDT
      Mary J 0604

      kjmgirl.... Happily accepted!! Thank you. :)

      • 8 votes
      #4.21 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:31 PM EDT
      Rusty in PA

      Maybe the government should require that everyone go back to horse & buggies

      Nah, then you've got the whole methane gas problem

      • 3 votes
      #4.22 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:33 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Rusty - methane can be turned into "clean energy" can't it? Hehehehehe

      • 7 votes
      #4.23 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:35 PM EDT
      greck

      methane can be turned into "clean energy" can't it?

      I've found it energizes a room full of people to clean out pretty quickly.

      • 7 votes
      #4.24 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:38 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      JaneinthisWorld - you did miss the point.

      I didn't miss any point, kjm, they're BOTH BAD! But to complain about air pollution at the same time that you are purposely and actively polluting your own body is a weak and illogical argument.

      *exhaling smoke* Or perhaps it just that I'm not a person who seems to have a stick up my ass while spewing self righteous bull@!$%#. :) Maybe you should take up smoking...it's very relaxing. :) I'm sure all that tension you are feeling is pretty bad for your health. :) Have a great day!! :) I know I will. :)

      It seems you are the one who missed the point.

      And this is what I'm talking about when I talk about projection. Do you fault an ex-smoker for having the strength to quit? I'm not spewing anything self-righteous, but its a weak defense to stand up for something you know is harmful to yourself and others and then attack others when they point out the flaws in your arguments.

      • 4 votes
      #4.25 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:43 PM EDT
      Rusty in PA

      Just be careful not to smoke in the stable!

      • 3 votes
      #4.26 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:45 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Whether or not it is "bad" is MY problem - not yours. Also, when people get treated like criminals for engaging in a perfectly legal activity, logic has a tendency to fly out the window.

      Anyway, the whole POINT of this seed was usury tax rates and how I am doing my level best to avoid them

      • 9 votes
      #4.27 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:46 PM EDT
      Mary J 0604

      And this is what I'm talking about when I talk about projection. Do you fault an ex-smoker for having the strength to quit? I'm not spewing anything self-righteous, but its a weak defense to stand up for something you know is harmful to yourself and others and then attack others when they point out the flaws in your arguments.

      No, I fault a rude person who attacked me for no reason. I fight back. :) You don't like taking it? Don't dish it out.

      • 10 votes
      #4.28 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:50 PM EDT
      Pat N

      My comment was in response to a prior comment where she sarcastically suggested not putting other pollutants in the air.

      I know what your comment was in response to. And I used what they call an 'analogy' to your snippy comment. It blows my mind that the self-rightous can condemn smokers with snark and condescension, yet when a similar comparison is thrown back at them, they get testy.

      Were you perhaps blind to the post that kjmgirl was responding to and the snarkiness that was contained in it? Or is your self-rightousness a one way street?

      • 11 votes
      #4.29 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:53 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Anyway, the whole POINT of this seed was usury tax rates and how I am doing my level best to avoid them

      Well, at the risk of being raked over the proverbial coals, I'll say it again: if you quit you could avoid the smoker's tax entirely!

      I know what your comment was in response to. And I used what they call an 'analogy' to your snippy comment.

      I don't know why you characterize my comment as snippy or self righteous, it was not intended as such. I am simply stating the obvious. Your analogy wasn't very well thought out. Although, as an ex-smoker, I know that when I used to need a cigarette my irritability responses were triggered more easily. Go have a smoke, Pat, you'll feel better.

      • 4 votes
      #4.30 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:23 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      jane - sigh. whatever

      • 6 votes
      #4.31 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:26 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Look , I really could care less if people want to smoke. Go right ahead and smoke. Just don't complain about all the direct consequences as a result of your choice to smoke and act as if you're being targeted or scapegoated, because none of it would happen if you didn't smoke.

      • 2 votes
      #4.32 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:35 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Jane, and if you weren't ALIVE you wouldn't have any income tax. What kind of a ridiculous argument is that for a usury tax rate? Just because what I do is unpopular with SOME people, I should be singled out for 125% TAXATION? That is NOT what the founding fathers intended when they gave government the right to impose taxes

      • 7 votes
      #4.33 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:39 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      What the founding fathers wanted isn't really relevant. They aren't here now. We are.

      My 37 year old sister in law was recently diagnosed with COPD. She's been smoking since she was 15. If she doesn't quit, she will be on an oxygen tank within 5 years. She will incur huge medical bills as a result. The rest of us will be paying for that. Now is that fair?

      Again, if you make the choice, you have to deal with the consequences. Or you can try to change the laws. Its not that difficult. Cause and effect.

      • 3 votes
      #4.34 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
      Brian White

      What the founding fathers wanted isn't really relevant. They aren't here now. We are.

      I weep for my country.

      • 8 votes
      #4.35 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:00 PM EDT
      Pat N

      What the founding fathers wanted isn't really relevant.

      oh....my....god.

      • 11 votes
      #4.36 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:15 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      The only relevant thing the Founding Fathers wanted was to create a document that could grow and change with the necessities of the people it served. Period.

      If you really want to get into what the founding fathers "intended" lets start by saying they never "intended" for any woman to have rights independent of her husband, and that includes smoking.

      Oh my God that.

      • 4 votes
      #4.37 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:04 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Yea, well it was those women that made them who they were, or at least took credit for, at that time, but we all know different. And, thank God for change. That doesn't mean they can still think they own the world.....they don't! I don't give credit to anyone that isn't worthy of it....that's growth. Hek

      • 7 votes
      #4.38 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:15 PM EDT
      fstwarrior

      Jane - you really need to start smoking again.

      You said "they never "intended" for any woman to have rights independent of her husband, and that includes smoking."

      Yup - you really need to get back to smoking or taking some better drugs than the ones you're on.

      • 8 votes
      #4.39 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:32 PM EDT
      Pat N

      The only relevant thing the Founding Fathers wanted was to create a document that could grow and change with the necessities of the people it served. Period.

      Funny...I don't remember seeing an addendum at the bottom of the constitution that says: "Please note. These terms and conditions are subject to change without notice. Limited time offer only."

      If you really want to get into what the founding fathers "intended" lets start by saying they never "intended" for any woman to have rights independent of her husband, and that includes smoking.

      Did you flunk history, per chance? We're getting off topic. Out of respect to the author, I won't deviate far except to say please study the roles Martha Washington, Betsey Hamilton, and Dolly Madison among many, many others. George Washington himself stated: "You ladies are in the best Patriots America can boast."

      Get back to us when you can think and study for yourself rather than regurgitating left wing propaganda.

      • 8 votes
      #4.40 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:20 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      PatN - just want to deviate with you for a moment - PERHAPS the Feds intended that STATES give their womenfolk the right to vote! Delaware did it with their very first Constititution. Maybe it simply fell under the 10th Amendment - like your right to smoke falls under the 4th and 9th (See, back on track now)

      • 6 votes
      #4.41 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:24 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Jane - you really need to start smoking again.

      You said "they never "intended" for any woman to have rights independent of her husband, and that includes smoking."

      No thanks I'll pass.

      I stand by the second statement though. They never imagined women would someday vote in this country or be treated as anything more than the property of her husband.

      • 4 votes
      #4.42 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:32 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      re-read my last comment then. and we'll move along BACK to cigarette taxes

      • 8 votes
      #4.43 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:42 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Maybe it simply fell under the 10th Amendment - like your right to smoke falls under the 4th and 9th (See, back on track now)

      That was a kick ass segue! =)

      • 11 votes
      #4.44 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:47 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      why thank you!

      • 10 votes
      #4.45 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:49 PM EDT
      TheJonesGirlDeleted
      BoudiceaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      TJG deleted for vile, ignorant, insulting crap which I will not tolerate. TJG, I have an idea - just go away. Talk about low class - you seem to be the stereotype. Just stay away from my threads. Keep your ignorance to yourself. If I could BAN you from everything I seed, believe me, I would. You are foul

      • 13 votes
      #4.47 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:09 PM EDT
      MikeA-1238275

      You are foul

      Reported for violating #1 of the COH.

      • 5 votes
      #4.48 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:45 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Knock yourself out, Mike. I warned TJG at LEAST 4 times

      • 10 votes
      #4.49 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:51 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      MikeA-1238275

      Hey Mike whats the A stand for { being an A$ }

      If that's not a COH violation, I don't know what is.

      And calling other users names is a COH violation even if it is being descriptive. If I say "You are stupid, ignorant, uninformed, pathetic, idiotic, illiterate, crazy, ridiculous, evil, and worthless," I've pretty effectively broken the COH, regardless of how "descriptive" I'm being. Wouldn't you agree?

      Knock yourself out, Mike. I warned TJG at LEAST 4 times

      Doesn't matter. Two COH violations don't make a right. You were right to delete her comment, but wrong to violate the COH yourself while doing so.

      • 5 votes
      #4.51 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:28 AM EDT
      Pat N

      If that's not a COH violation, I don't know what is.

      Asking a question is now a violation of CoH? Are you really that thin skinned?

      • 6 votes
      #4.52 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:09 AM EDT
      Brite

      Dang... go to bed and miss all the excitement....

      • 5 votes
      #4.53 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:14 AM EDT
      MikeA-1238275

      Asking a question is now a violation of CoH? Are you really that thin skinned?

      If I was to hypothetically ask someone "What type of parents did you have, in order to produce such a completely idiotic piece of human trash?," it would definitely be a COH violation. Grow up and quit it with the personal attacks.

      • 3 votes
      #4.54 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:48 PM EDT
      Pat N

      If I was to hypothetically ask someone "What type of parents did you have, in order to produce such a completely idiotic piece of human trash?," it would definitely be a COH violation.

      You read THAT into "what does the 'A' stand for?" Goodness.

      Grow up and quit it with the personal attacks.

      I'd be happy to get back on track, but you seem to have gotten awfully quiet after your "logical fallicy" that smoking is a leading cause of cancer was soundly trounced. Shame on you for not knowing that 70% of all cancer deaths happen in developing nations where there is very little smoking occuring and the disease is attributed to other toxins. A real man would have been able to at least concede the point. You just slithered away. What's up with that?

      • 7 votes
      #4.55 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:00 PM EDT
      MikeA-1238275

      You read THAT into "what does the 'A' stand for?" Goodness.

      No, I illustrated how stupid the concept that "a question can't violate the COH' is.

      I'd be happy to get back on track, but you seem to have gotten awfully quiet after your "logical fallicy" that smoking is a leading cause of cancer was soundly trounced.

      Cute. I demonstrated that smoking causes almost 1/4 of deaths of cancer; I'd say that makes it a leading cause of cancer. And for Christ's sake, 'fallicy' is not a word.

      Shame on you for not knowing that 70% of all cancer deaths happen in developing nations where there is very little smoking occuring and the disease is attributed to other toxins.

      Shame on you for not knowing that about 24% of deaths from cancer are as a result of smoking.

      A real man would have been able to at least concede the point.

      Wow, really?

      You just slithered away. What's up with that?

      Still here, hon.

      • 3 votes
      #4.56 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:44 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      OK both of you, enough! I've had my slap on the wrist from Tyler and JonesGirl has been suspended so lets get this back on track, alright????

      • 7 votes
      #4.57 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:47 PM EDT
      MikeA-1238275

      Ok. I mean, in the end, this discussion is academic; smokers have pretty much lost all the big battles. This new generation is less likely to see smoking as desirable than any before, smoking has been successfully stigmatized and (accurately) portrayed as dirty and unhealthy, and these trends are waxing, not waning. So we can argue about whether smoking really causes cancer, or whatever, but in the end I could lose every debate here and still win the war.

      I think with that, I'll end my participation on this increasingly nasty thread.

      • 2 votes
      #4.58 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:51 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Mike you have to do what you have to do. The THREAD WAS ABOUT TAXES in the first place, NOT cancer.

      • 5 votes
      #4.59 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:56 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      No...it was about taxes on cigarettes. You have to be prepared for some digression, such as why we would put these taxes on cigs to begin with. Otherwise, you should be deleting any comment not related to taxes, and there are a whole lot of comments not related to the topic of taxes on cigarettes.

      • 3 votes
      #4.60 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:14 PM EDT
      tyler

      Hey Mike whats the A stand for { being an A$$ }

      Cut it out, PastNikeVet-906575.

      If I could BAN you from everything I seed, believe me, I would.

      Done. kjmgirl, TheJonesGirl, don't address or mention each other on Newsvine again. I think boht of you should have had each other on ignore long before this. You're both capable of writing like grownups, but this is more than enough evidence that you don't do it around each other.

      • 12 votes
      #4.61 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:16 PM EDT
      Reply
      WILDWONDERFUL

      The government does not want you to quit smoking

      • 12 votes
      Reply#5 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:21 PM EDT
      ebookout

      But they are not taxing the middle class and poor.
      My ass.

      • 8 votes
      #5.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:40 PM EDT
      daMamma

      The government does not want you to quit smoking

      Very true. As they have discovered a goldmine with this tax. Which does not go to fund what it was supposed to be funding when it was implemented. Which IMO is so wrong on too many levels. When the fed and states started this tax the populace was told it would go to the health care costs of smokers. None goes towards that goal. It all goes into the general fund to be used where ever the fed and states decide they want to spend the money. (roads, bridges, etc.)

      While that is a problem, the double taxation is wrong. Those who smoke don't just pay the taxes put forth by both the federal government and their state government, but also pay a sales tax on the price of the cigarettes that include those other taxes in the price being taxed by the sale.

      In essence having to pay a tax on the taxes they are already paying. Example: (just to make it crystal clear) Say a pack costs $2, the federal tax is $3 and the state tax is $2. The price of that pack is now $7. Add in the sales tax at the POS. (point of sale) Say the state sales tax is 5%. The buyer is not paying the 5% sales tax on the $2 price of the pack, but IS paying the 5% sales tax on the total price of $7. The price should be $7.10, what they would pay in reality is $7.35.

      That's wrong. Its double taxation. I don't know if that is illegal or not, but it is definitely wrong.

      Now that smokers have been properly vilified and demonized, society is now setting its sights on those who are over weight and the products that are known to be a problem to cause obesity. Welcome to the smoker's club of "evil people" and the brave new world of taxed silly.

      Most of those that don't drink alcohol (another that is sin taxed and aims are to go higher with that), those that don't smoke cigarettes or use tobacco products, those that do not imbibe in junk foods and beverages don't honestly care that those people are taxed silly.

      Perhaps those people would begin to care when hit with outrageous taxes for something they do. All I know is what goes around, comes around an it is only a matter of time. (a heavy weight Longevity Tax?)

      • 8 votes
      #5.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:24 AM EDT
      greck

      so,

      it logically follows that all smokers who are libertarian or otherwise anti-big government, should quit smoking if they want to "starve the beast" then,

      right?

      • 2 votes
      #5.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:55 AM EDT
      Reply
      Midwestlady

      Great idea. I actually have purchase those electric nicotine diffusers, Straight nicotine, no second-hand smoke (Just water vapor) no other chemicals or by-products. Cuts down on my expense by 2/3.

      • 7 votes
      Reply#6 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:25 PM EDT
      There They Go Again

      That would be a pretty good idea ML. When Michigan and the Federal Government raised taxes on the bagged bulk tobacco, I switched to small menthol cigars at $2.00 per pack. Much worse for my lungs than cigarettes ever were but they drove me away from paying their taxes; the taxes they added on to force me to quit and get healthy. Who can figure the logic of government types? Now, when I ask a lawmaker questions before deciding for whom to vote, the first question asked, often publicly, is whether they voted for this abortion of a law. They usually try to justify their vote by talking about public health etc. My reply is always the same: "I'm just like the NRA; I don't care in the least about your excuses. The fact that you voted for it is enough for me, no matter how many other good things you may have done." If all of us vote that one issue, the lawmakers will find out very quickly that they have just pissed off 30% of their votes.

      • 7 votes
      #6.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:41 PM EDT
      lib50

      Can you tell me which one works best, Midwestlady? I am considering one of the electronic cigs myself.

      • 1 vote
      #6.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:08 PM EDT
      Reply
      Elaine-1503791

      I have to agree with you KJM my friend, I smoke and I buy the cheapest brand and it's $30 a carton. The Gov't is just out of control and all up in people's lives. I'd love to see that change, and I mean radically change. That's why I like Ron Paul...."Legalize Freedom!"

      • 13 votes
      Reply#7 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:27 PM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      Legalize Freedom indeed no wonder the media blocked him out when he ran for President. Ron Paul knows exactly what the people need and that is freedom let it ring!!

      • 6 votes
      #7.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:08 PM EDT
      Dowser

      Do y'all mean Rand Paul?

      Please, I mean no disrespect to either of you-- you are my friends, and I love you both. At the same time, if you like him, please, I'll be more than happy to ship him to your state, where you can vote for him. :-)

      Take care, both of you, and know that I love you both bunches! I mean absolutely no disrespect! Take Rand Paul, please!

      • 6 votes
      #7.2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:11 PM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      No I mean Ron Paul not Rand. Ron Paul is the guy trying to take out the Federal Reserve or at least hold them accountabvle for what is being done with our money.

      • 8 votes
      #7.3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:19 PM EDT
      Dowser

      Thank you Lisa, for your patience with my ignorance and your kindness.

      However, my offer stands, for anyone, you want Rand Paul, you can have him, in your very own state!

      Thank you thank you thank you.

      (((((((((((((Lisa and Elaine))))))))))))))

      • 5 votes
      #7.4 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:22 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      ))))))Ron Paul((((((

      • 6 votes
      #7.5 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:45 PM EDT
      There They Go Again

      Dowser,

      Rand Paul is Ron Paul's son. Don't believe the junk you hear on CNN about him. He's really no worse than any other politician; which, when you think about it, isn't much of a recommendation.

      • 3 votes
      #7.6 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:57 PM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      I am just here for the hugs((((Dowser))).

      Try to be patient with Rand is is not a professional politician. That makes it much easier to make him look like a bufoon. I really do know he does stand for freedom though.

      • 4 votes
      #7.7 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:15 PM EDT
      Dowser

      Please-- I do not like political discussions, and don't partake. You are welcome to him, just please don't saddle my state with him. We have enough nuts running around.

      I do much more than watch CNN, Dear There-- I actually watch the local and national news and read the local newspapers. Neither candidate for the Republican Primary was endorsed by the Louisville Courier Journal, nor the Lexington Herald Leader, and Rand Paul's own hometown newspaper does not endorse him for election in November.

      Not only that, but my family has a camper at Cave City, just 20 miles from Bowling Green, Mr. Paul's home. We live down there on many weekends from the first of April to the end of November, and holidays in between.

      His own party censured him in the KY State Senate. His ophthalmologist's license is a sham. The Hell is Real billboard is in a county north of Bowling Green, LaRue County. The billboard may lose KY $42 million in Federal funds, and the bill supposed to create an exception to KY law was supported by Mr. Paul.

      Does he have an idea about the problems facing African Americans in our own state? Warren County is 8.8% African Americans, Barren County is 7.7%, Hart County is 5.2%, and Edmonson County, home to the Neo-Nazis is 1.5%. (Kentucky County Census Data, Map of KY counties) If he doesn't have a clue about their problems, nor how to adequately run a more professional campaign, do you really want him in a national arena? However, that would likely suit his Neo-Nazi/KKK neighbors just fine.

      No, I'm not saying he is associated with them, nor am I saying he is endorsed by them, but there is a nest of those vipers down there in Edmonson County, and they would have no problem with him. Here is an article about the Christian Reconstructionist Movement, where Rand Paul discussed his feelings about race, creationism, etc. This movement would have all government, be it local, state, federal, etc. subject to and secondary to the Bible.

      I'm sorry, I can't buy into it. I try to live my life in a Christian manner-- without hatred for anyone or anything. But, this conversation has alarmed to so much, I'm writing a check to Jack Conway as of this evening. He must need my money if this nut is making such a favorable impression on the national stage.

      Believe me. Please. I live here. No one, Republican, Democrat, Independent, not even Tea Party people, needs this guy in a national office.

      • 13 votes
      #7.8 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:22 PM EDT
      bonos_rama

      "I really do know he does stand for freedom though."

      No, he doesn't. He's anti-choice for women.

      • 6 votes
      #7.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:18 AM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      Actually he is for states rights which means a state could choose not to have legal abortions if they wanted or they could have legal marijuana if they want to.

      • 6 votes
      #7.10 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:22 AM EDT
      Reply
      coalbear_1

      Smokers are addicted to the additives in cigarettes more so than the nicotine. I have grown my own tobacco and it's just not the same. It's stronger but it does not kill the cravings for a company processed Marlboro or whatever. The tobacco companies know this and big brother profits on that fact. They are now using additives to make the cigarette go out when a 100% tobacco cigarette would act the same. They just add more additives to counteract the additives. This makes you consume even more, ain't they a gem.

      • 9 votes
      Reply#8 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:18 PM EDT
      Dowser

      So, what are you going to use for a filter? Or will you have one?

      Great article!

      • 5 votes
      #9 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:34 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      The cigarette tubes have filters in them

      • 8 votes
      #9.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:50 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      I am so stocking up tomorrow. Thanks for the "how" to on this kjmgirl. I find it ridiculous to treat smokers like we are some kind of criminal...for God's sake they aren't "illegal". Until they make them illegal, they need to leave us alone nad give us back our rights. All this no smoking bull@!$%# is hurting a lot of businesses by the way. Another way to get the small man business's closed. They know exactly what they are doing...and no, I don't believe they "want" us to quit...but when they finally get everyone backed into a corner, then they will start fining them for money to get it a different way. I heard this lady in the store a couple of weeks ago tell her child who was wanting a bike, "if I buy it for you", you can't ride it on the street"....WTF. (Oh, and once my husband bought me this beautiful gown from Victoria's Secret, all silk, very expensive and says to me, "now your not allowed to eat in it, or do anything to ruin it, it's just for show", I took it back and bought some flannels/cottons, I swear. Hek. Thanks for the article!!!

      • 12 votes
      #9.2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:16 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Hek - glad I could help. I'm not saying smoking is a good idea - but you gotta love it when you figure out a way to F*#k the government out of extortion money - LEGALLY

      • 13 votes
      #9.3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:21 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      I know it's not good for your health, I smoke. When they can come up with a way to help us quit....like everyone else gets for their addiction, instead of treating us like second class citizens, well then, I'm in. Or, until it's illegal, they need to leave us the hell alone. So far, nothing I have done works, or the side affects make me really sick, reactions and so forth. Anyway, it's my body, it's my money, money I work for, I pay my taxes, and it's my choice. Screw em. Hey, I go to work so people on Welfare can depend on me...I certainly can't depend on them! (meaning Government) Argggggg

      • 12 votes
      #9.4 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:52 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      I am all for you reducing the cost of your addiction. Although, if you quit not only would the government not get your money, it would be better for your health too.

      And it doesn't matter if you get help for your addiction. Its hard to break an addiction no matter what it is. Bottom line is you just gotta want it bad enough. When you do, you'll quit.

      I smoked passively since before I was born. I began actively smoking at 16 and I smoked a pack a day for the next 12 and a half years. I quit when I got pregnant. My baby's health was more important than my addiction. I stayed quit so my kids would have a lesser risk of smoking themselves.

      Don't kid yourself. Smoking is a curse.

      • 4 votes
      #9.5 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:37 PM EDT
      Jixer

      If everyone were to quit smoking today, the government would just find something else to tax. It's already happening with tanning and sodas. Who knows what would be next.

      • 9 votes
      #9.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:19 AM EDT
      TheJonesGirl

      Anyway, it's my body, it's my money, money I work for, I pay my taxes, and it's my choice.

      Ever heard of secondhand smoke? Your nasty addiction affects more than you. And yes, it is vile. I think of smokers as not very bright, who would try it, given all we know anymore, let alone spend hundreds a month on it?

      • 2 votes
      #9.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:49 AM EDT
      Bernard Ira Lasky

      I used to smoke, and I agree that smokers aren't very bright and their second hand smoke IS gross. I stopped smoking because after sitting next to an obese person on an airline and being put upon by his fat, sweaty slop hanging all over me and my seat and squeezing me in, I realize how annoying and inconvenient other people's vices can be to the rest of us. I put down the cigarette pack, now I'm hoping that obese people will put down their forks because it's no fun being exposed to second hand, sweaty fat.

      Now that I have stopped smoking, I want to work on making boats for pleasure illegal. Cabin cruisers, motor boats, and speed boats put fumes in the air and pollute our waterways with oil. I am trying to be healthy now and pleasure boating is un-necessary. Our waterways should only be used for commerce. It will cut down on pollution.

      • 3 votes
      #9.8 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:42 AM EDT
      Jixer

      Bernard - So you suddenly became smarter after you quit smoking? Was it the lack of haze/smoke or was it something else that made you smarter? Will President Obama get smarter after he quits smoking? I sure hope so.

      • 5 votes
      #9.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:59 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Bernard - Really? Smokers aren't very bright? I graduated from a private college summa cum laude. Did you? And for your information, MOST smokers are very very courteous about second hand smoke. UNLIKE those obnoxious people who walk into a bar that allows smoking and start bitching about the smell.

      • 14 votes
      #9.10 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:24 AM EDT
      fstwarrior

      'Course kjm, you know Einstein was stupid 'cause he smoked cigars and pipes and I know all of my family with IQ's over 148 and who smoke aren't very bright either which is why all of us have Master's or better degrees. Dammm, I hate it 'cause smoking did that to us.

      • 9 votes
      #9.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:12 AM EDT
      daMamma

      Why do some ex smokers, (drinkers too) become such militant killjoys of hate filled spite? Not much is worse than a "reformed" person on a mission.

      • 13 votes
      #9.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:53 AM EDT
      fstwarrior

      hee hee hee hee

      • 5 votes
      #9.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:13 PM EDT
      Checkmate-983933

      "If everyone were to quit smoking today, the government would just find something else to tax. It's already happening with tanning and sodas. Who knows what would be next."

      Well, considering some politician wanted to tax us by how many miles we drove and the air that we breathe (I'm not joking. Look it up).

      The government is tax happy. This is what will be next; I can see it happening:

      salt
      caffeine
      sugar substitutes
      oil (any type; olive, vegetable, fish, etc.)

      • 7 votes
      #9.14 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:15 PM EDT
      mightyj

      daMamma- I know the answer to that one.... pick me!...pick me!.....puts arm down..

      It is a coping mechanism, when they first quit they are bummed out and feel like they are giving something up. It's sort of a I gave it all up and put myself out, so why can't you?

      I have made the sacrifice, had the will power, been the better person, blah...blah..blah...with extra self-aggrandizing and of course all kinds of diminishing and marginalizing statements for anybody who is still addicted or hasn't stopped the behavior.

      All that to make them feel better about a decision that they would otherwise be struggling with. I think if a person that is quitting can say, "this is not a big deal anybody can do it," and be positive about the experience, then when dealing with those who haven't decided to quit yet, they will have only positive things to say. Like YOU CAN DO IT!!! .......and that's all. JJ

      • 7 votes
      #9.15 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:39 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Why do some ex smokers, (drinkers too) become such militant killjoys of hate filled spite?

      Projecting just a little bit there. I can tell you, I have way more joy in my life without smoking than I ever did with it.

      "Hate filled spite" - again, projecting your own feelings on someone else. Denial is heavy when you're in a smoke filled haze.

      • 3 votes
      #9.16 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 PM EDT
      lib50

      I can't wait to save all the money when I don't buy cigs. I have a LONG way to go though, quitting is so hard.

      • 3 votes
      #9.17 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:12 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Jonesgirl -Your nasty addiction affects more than you. And yes, it is vile. I think of smokers as not very bright, who would try it, given all we know anymore, let alone spend hundreds a month on it?

      Anyone that spews "nastiness" in whatever form outta their mouth is unhealthy to everyone!

      Because I can, that's why!!!

      • 9 votes
      #9.18 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:15 PM EDT
      Rhazes

      I'm sorry some of you have problems with second hand smoke. Most states have passed laws protecting non smokers if your state doesn't have them then do a little leg work.

      I quit smoking 3 months ago and I'm not getting any second hand smoke. No one smokes in my apartment, no one smokes in my car, at work I don't go outside with the smokers and follow them 900 yards away where they are allowed to smoke. In my state unless its a smoke shop smoking is most likely banned even before that law there was restaurants, bars and clubs that did not allow smoking. Your obviously not a hostage so it sounds like your problem is YOU.

      • 7 votes
      #9.19 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:02 AM EDT
      Brite

      Is it me... or do the militant NON smokers seem to walk right up to us "militant" smokers so that they can whine and complain about our second hand smoke??

      • 7 votes
      #9.20 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:50 AM EDT
      Pat N

      Is it me... or do the militant NON smokers seem to walk right up to us "militant" smokers so that they can whine and complain about our second hand smoke??

      So true!!

      Two recent examples:

      1) I was stuck at the Milwaukee airport after their recent floods. There is a DESIGNATED smoking area outside of baggage claim. I was sitting there, having a smoke, frustrated as hell because I couldn't get home and minding my own business. This couple walks out and decide to perch their butts right next to me. In the DESIGNATED smoking area. After a couple of minutes, the lady turns to the guy and says "Lets move. Someone stinks around here."

      2) We have a lot of casinos around here. I was at one, sat down next to a lady at a slot machine, lit a cigarette and she proceeded to do this overly dramatic hand-waving in front of her face. I just turned to her and said "You know, they have a really nice non-smoking area down stairs. You might be more comfortable there." She looked at me with a death glare and said: "They don't have this machine downstairs! Maybe YOU shouldn't smoke!" I said: Look lady, if you're going to play in the smoking are, you need to suck it up and deal with the smoke." She got up and left.

      • 9 votes
      #9.21 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:11 AM EDT
      Brite

      Like my husband (who quit smoking, after finishing his BS in nursing, 20 years ago) points out it became OK to harass and abuse smokers thanks to the American Lung Association and the many states won their lawsuits against the tobacco companies. We became second class citizens. He goes on to point out that the research on the cancer studies about the correlation between smoking and cancer is flawed, but who are you going to trust to DO more research? AND that the research on second hand smoke is flawed... again same question.

      He may be a reformed smoker... but when I have a cigarette... he stands by me, while I do it... I think, that sometimes, he's hoping for the second hand smoke....

      • 8 votes
      #9.22 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:21 AM EDT
      Pat N

      Is it just me, or is it usually women who have no qualms about harassing smokers? Seems like non-smoking men who don't want to be around it will simply move, whereas women will get in your face about it.

      • 6 votes
      #9.23 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:58 AM EDT
      Brite

      And they get down right NASTY about it... Bless their little hearts... (I LOVE living in the South... so much gentility!)

      My personal favorite is standing in the "smoking areas" at Disney (yes... Disney now has designated smoking areas... one bench, 50 gazillion smokers, 2 butt cans) and some militant non smoker mother with her cute, adorable, yet squalling child insists on standing right there so that she can complain about the smoke... LOUDLY... VERY LOUDLY... with language that would make even the most hardened military person blush (and being former military, having grown up in the military, and having MARRIED into the military TWICE, trust me... I know some language!)

      • 7 votes
      #9.24 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:12 AM EDT
      Pat N

      My personal favorite is standing in the "smoking areas" at Disney (yes... Disney now has designated smoking areas... one bench, 50 gazillion smokers, 2 butt cans) and some militant non smoker mother with her cute, adorable, yet squalling child insists on standing right there so that she can complain about the smoke... LOUDLY... VERY LOUDLY... with language that would make even the most hardened military person blush

      I think you just hit on something! Lets tax R rated language used by parents in front of their PG rated little 'angels'! Every time one of them uses abusive language against smokers in front of their kids, the smoker gets to hand them a tax bill. I think $2,000 per swear word is fair.

      (and being former military, having grown up in the military, and having MARRIED into the military TWICE, trust me... I know some language!)

      Thank you for your service! What branch? My daughter is in her 7th week of boot camp at Fort Leonard Wood. I've been doing a series here on the Vine of her letters. It's amazing how she's gone from "I made the wrong decision and I want to come home"...to "HOOAH! We rock! Bring on the bad guys!" in 7 short weeks.

      • 7 votes
      #9.25 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:30 AM EDT
      Brite

      She's at "Lost in the Woods"?? oh... sorry... was that my out loud voice?? I spent 4 GLORIOUS weeks at Lost in the Woods learning to type at the HIGH rate of speed of 20 words per minute! My first MOS was Combat Medic (that's the secret cover for CNAs and EMTs in the Army during peace time...) which meant 12 weeks at Ft Sam Houston, in San Antonio. Mom was Air Force, Dad was Navy... My sister and I went Army, both of us married into the Army too... then divorced the Army... then I married into it again, while she married into the Marines, poor thing...

      If your daughter is in the 7th week... she's almost done... what's her MOS going to be?? I'm SO excited!! I LOVE baby soldiers!!!!!!!!! When I'm on post (which right now, isn't often... I ran away from home to go to culinary school... yes... I left him... LMAO) I'm very involved in the Morale support unit... I did it as an enlisted man's wife and I do it now as an officer's wife... and YOU, mama... if you need any help... you get in touch with me... If I can answer any questions or help you get some answers... I will... :)

      • 7 votes
      #9.26 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:44 AM EDT
      Pat N

      She's at "Lost in the Woods"?? oh... sorry... was that my out loud voice?? I spent 4 GLORIOUS weeks at Lost in the Woods learning to type at the HIGH rate of speed of 20 words per minute!

      Small world! She goes on and on about the heat, the bugs, the weather...In her last letter, she saw a dust bunny moving. Thought she was going crazy. Untill she noticed there was a centipede stuck under it.

      If your daughter is in the 7th week... she's almost done... what's her MOS going to be?? I'm SO excited!! I LOVE baby soldiers!!!!!!!!!

      LOL! Her MOS is 35N. Intel. Signals Analyst. They're sending her to Goodfellow AFB in San Angelo, TX for AIT. That seemed wierd to me. An AFB for an Army MOS? At any rate, since it's an AFB and the AF is essentially pampered, she's going to think she died and went to heaven. It will be like a resort to her after FLW.

      ... and YOU, mama... if you need any help... you get in touch with me... If I can answer any questions or help you get some answers... I will... :)

      Believe me...I just may be taking you up on that offer!

      If you want, check out the series of her letter. You might get a kick out of them. They start here, and I posted a link to the next part in the series at the end of each thread.

      http://panicklaus.newsvine.com/_news/2010/06/13/4504354-letters-from-boot-camp-part-1

      If you don't want to read through all of the posts and just read her letters, just go to the end of each thread and click the link I posted to the next one.

      I'd welcome your contributions and insight!

      • 6 votes
      #9.27 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:22 PM EDT
      Brite

      My husband is at Ft Sam in San Antonio... San Angelo is just down the road... and you are right... the AF are pampered... the food ALONE is worth the price of admission! LMAO (Just TRY and eat in an Army hospital cafeteria... I DARE you... I DOUBLE dog dare you!)

      She thinks it's hot in Misery?? Wait till she gets to Texas! bwahahahahahahaha

      • 6 votes
      #9.28 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:34 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Reply
      Little Sure Shot

      I quit a 3 pack a day habit going on 2 months now. But I stand behind all of you who still smoke.

      • 11 votes
      #10 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:21 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      God love ya, Little Sure Shot. Wish I could stop but at least this way I'll be getting less chemicals in my body. Maybe some day... It's not something I'm proud of, and sometimes I just look at my pack of smokes and say "what in the hell are you thinking?" But many many many years ago I had a bad habit with a much much more dangerous drug and was able to quit. Why can't I quit smoking?????

      • 7 votes
      #10.1 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:20 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Sure Shot - how'd you do it? And, Congratulations!!! I am wanting to quit..but just can't seem to do it by myself. And, nothing else has been successful in trying with other types of medications.

      • 7 votes
      #10.2 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:02 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      But I stand behind all of you who still smoke.

      Go ahead and smoke. But I'd rather not stand behind you when you do it.

      How do you do it? You just do. It isn't easy.

      • 4 votes
      #10.3 - Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:39 PM EDT
      Judy Ostrom

      I travel to the indians in a nieghboring state...saves me about 50% per carton...bummer for my state but there own fault!

      • 7 votes
      #10.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:45 AM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      But many many many years ago I had a bad habit with a much much more dangerous drug and was able to quit. Why can't I quit smoking?????

      Sweetie stop beating yourself. I can hear your pain speaking. Our bodies actually have nicotine receptors there must be a reason for that. Plus I am almost certain there is some undisclosed substance in tobacco products that keep people addicted. The drug you were addicted to probably was much purer than our tobacco products are.

      I have been in recovery for many years because of an alcohol problem. I have studied addiction looking for answers. I am a part of a huge online community for addiction and I blog with them almost daily. What I do know is addiction has something to do with pain. This pain can be of the body, mind or spirit. I used to think making drugs illegal was a good thing but now I am not so sure of that because I see how making drugs illegal just adds to the pain. I have experienced the pain of the legal system thru one of my brothers who has been locked up so many times for drug law violations. Putting him in prison has not helped him one bit and has hurt our family in so many ways. To me making drugs illegal is cruel and even probably unconstitutional. I hope to God that tobacco is not made illegal because it will cause more harm than good. I think taxing and unjust laws are the problem not the addiction.

      I also want to point out that people have been programed to believe tobacco kills I am not saying it is good for you but the program flipping thru our brain instilling guilt I think is every bit if not more harmful. Many people have lived to be over 90 years and even 100 that smoke and drink and probably also take drugs too but just do admit it publiclly.

      If I can give you any advice about it all I say be gentle with yourself. Also, good for you for finding a money saving solution.

      • 8 votes
      #10.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:45 AM EDT
      TheJonesGirl

      Everyone can quit. You just have to want it badly enough and be willing to take the temporary pain.

      • 1 vote
      #10.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:50 AM EDT
      bonos_rama

      I don't think I've ever met a woman who could go cold turkey. I've known many men that have done it pretty easily, though. It seems to me men have the willpower in this area while women do not. I wonder if anyone has ever done a study on this?

      • 2 votes
      #10.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:20 AM EDT
      ming-315743

      kjmgirl,I feel for you. I know you did not post to get a lecture on how bad and how wrong smoking is. More power to you if you found a cheaper way to support your addiction. I have never smoked so I can't know how strong that addiction is. To each their own.

      • 4 votes
      #10.8 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:24 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Thanks ming - I'll have to admit I'm pretty sick and tired of those bozos who start this "anyone can quit" bull@!$%# - generally they are extremely opinionated and feel superior to the rest of us. I just figure if smoking is my only vice and I'm not, say Stupid, Unfeelingand Judgmental, then I'm doin OK

      • 10 votes
      #10.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:28 AM EDT
      daMamma

      Wow, LittleSureShot! Good for you and congratulations! That is exciting and I wish you continued success.
      : )

      • 7 votes
      #10.10 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:03 PM EDT
      Checkmate-983933

      "I don't think I've ever met a woman who could go cold turkey."

      My mom can. She stopped for a few months. . .then she got my college tuition bill and. . .LOL.

      • 7 votes
      #10.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:17 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      I quit cold turkey. But I was pregnant. Smoking simply wasn't an option anymore. It wasn't easy. But there was something more important at stake.

      • 4 votes
      #10.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:17 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Jane - I know a lot of people who quit when they were pregnant - mainly because it made them sick.

      • 9 votes
      #10.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:20 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      It didn't make me sick. If that were the case I could have picked it up again after my child was born. I didn't want to pass on the curse of smoking that I had inherited from my parents, its that easy.

      • 3 votes
      #10.14 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:48 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Now I get it. You're one of the "born agains"

      • 9 votes
      #10.15 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:55 PM EDT
      lib50

      I quit when I was pregnant and through my kids childhood. Then it crept up on me. One cig here, one there and slowly it built back up into the habit I have today. It is SO HARD to quit. Something has to happen in your head before your body follows, at least in my case. I can't get the head thing going. But I can feel the toll they take on me, and one day hope I will be done with the cigs forever. Maybe if they legalize pot here.....

      • 4 votes
      #10.16 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:16 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Now I get it. You're one of the "born agains"

      See now what's with your snippiness? You fault someone who was able to quit? Why? Because I don't want my kids to be chained to a nicotine addiction? It's not a bad thing, you know.

      Lib50 is right, it is hard. We should help and encourage people to quit. But if you can't quit, don't get all nasty with the rest of us because we could.

      • 4 votes
      #10.17 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:27 PM EDT
      Brite

      Ms Jane...

      You are one of those people who managed to quit and are filled with the righteous fires of the "born again"... And good for you. You did something that many of us who smoke wish that we we COULD do. But, frankly, copping attitude, and being snide and rude is not the way to go. In fact all it really does is make people like me really want to tell people like you where to go...

      • 9 votes
      #10.18 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT
      Pat N

      See now what's with your snippiness?

      Are you not one of the 'born-agains'? Are you not a former smoker that's now telling current smokers what a bad and nasty thing they're doing is? Sorry if my words weren't PC enough for you. But you really aren't any different than the former addict that found religion and is now preaching to current addicts to 'change their evil ways'...

      You fault someone who was able to quit?

      Not at all. In fact, I think it's great. But I don't need your opinion on what I do with my body. Let's switch to the food thing again, shall we? Let's throw exercise in, too. I'm willing to bet you eat worse than I do and don't get the exercise I get. Should I tell you that you are slovenly, prone to cravings and out of shape and that if you want to continue 'destroying yourself' more power to you?

      Because I don't want my kids to be chained to a nicotine addiction?

      Have you seriously raised your kids to be that codependent? Wow. Ya know...this is the second time you've brought this up. You blamed your parents for the fact that you're a smoker. Now you're suggesting that your kids will be smokers if you are. I have an 18 year old. She's spent the past 6 weeks running two miles a day, doing 30 push ups and 70 sit ups daily in boot camp. She never smoked in her life. Not so much as a drag of a cigarette. I guess some of us raise our kids to make their own decisions rather than mimicking us.

      • 8 votes
      #10.19 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Not at all. In fact, I think it's great. But I don't need your opinion on what I do with my body. Let's switch to the food thing again, shall we? Let's throw exercise in, too. I'm willing to bet you eat worse than I do and don't get the exercise I get. Should I tell you that you are slovenly, prone to cravings and out of shape and that if you want to continue 'destroying yourself' more power to you?

      WRONG!

      I lost 75 pounds about 13 years ago. I'm now a fitness instructor at a gym. I do about an hour of cardio every day and weight training 4 days a week. I'm going through a program now to teach a strength and conditioning class.

      You blamed your parents for the fact that you're a smoker. Now you're suggesting that your kids will be smokers if you are.

      The statistics state that if one or both your parents smoke you have a better than 50% chance of becoming a smoker. Both my parents smoked, and of all 6 kids in my family 5 of us became smokers. Only one of us has been able to quit (me).

      My parents smoked around me my whole life. I never had a chance. I was already addicted before I ever actively smoked.

      Most smokers start before they are 19 years old. Tobacco companies target kids as new smokers. If you can make it into your 20's without starting to smoke, you are significantly less likely to have a lifelong addiction.

      Again, I'm not making fun of anyone, I'm not being self righteous. I used to smoke, so I KNOW how hard it is. I'm just stating the obvious.

      • 4 votes
      #10.20 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:00 PM EDT
      Brian White

      See now what's with your snippiness? You fault someone who was able to quit? Why?

      I quit four years ago, but I still feel the same about smoker's rights now as I did then. I fully support smoking being up to property owners. I fully support people's right to smoke in public.

      • 9 votes
      #10.21 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:02 PM EDT
      Brite

      truth is, Ms Jane, I grew up in a house where both parents smoked. I didn't start smoking till I was 22, when my husband went off to invade Grenada... It was either smoke or drink. Since I knew that alcoholism ran in the family, and I understood the devastation that it could cause, I chose smoking to calm my nerves... that was 25 years ago...

      6 children, 5 grandchildren to my credit - I am healthy, I work, and yes, I still smoke. I do this, knowing the damage that it does to my body, and knowing that nicotine is more addictive than crack cocaine.

      I do not smoke in the house, I do not smoke around non smokers and I try to be a polite smoker. But I'll be DAMNED if I will be vilified by a born again non smoker for being a smoker.

      • 9 votes
      #10.22 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:16 PM EDT
      Pat N

      I lost 75 pounds about 13 years ago.

      Woo-hoo! Here's my chance to throw it right back at you janey. Tell me how you like it, OK?

      So you were such a fat slob that you had to lose 75 pounds? Wow. You were a real porker. Why jane....how in the world could you treat your body so poorly that you let it get in that condition to begin with? Were you lazy? Don't you know that it was unhealthy for you to get so fat and gross? (Tilting nose to the sky)...I never had to lose 75 pounds. I never had a problem with weight. I always ate healthy. I overcame where you failed. I am svelte enough to have my picture on my avatar.

      How's it feel, jane? Did you like that?

      Again, I'm not making fun of anyone, I'm not being self righteous

      Making fun? No. Being self righteous? Yes indeedy. What's sad is that you don't even realize it.

      You sing in one note, jane: "me me me me me me"

      • 10 votes
      #10.23 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:24 PM EDT
      Pat N

      do not smoke in the house, I do not smoke around non smokers and I try to be a polite smoker. But I'll be DAMNED if I will be vilified by a born again non smoker for being a smoker.

      Applauding wildy! =)

      • 11 votes
      #10.24 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:28 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      YeeHaw.........right on!!!

      • 11 votes
      #10.25 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:32 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Wow. You were a real porker. Why jane....how in the world could you treat your body so poorly that you let it get in that condition to begin with?

      Well, first I got pregnant. Then I quit smoking. Remember back when smoking was encouraged among women as a way to control their weight? Fortunatly I didn't buy the scam and fall back into it after my baby was born.

      You sing in one note, jane: "me me me me me me"

      I hear the song, but its your voice singing it.

      Again, sounds like you're just projecting your own feelings onto someone else. Like I said, I don't care if you smoke. Go right ahead. Have at. Just don't complain about the consequences as a result of it.

      • 4 votes
      #10.26 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:09 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      So far, the most self-righteous people here have been the smokers.

      • 3 votes
      #10.27 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:24 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Who ever said anyone was complaining of the consequence that could or might be.....we are complaining of the consequences that are happening now....our cival rights. Geeeeesh. Have you not gotten yet what the real focus of this whole thing is? Apparently not. Really sad for a seemingly intelligent person and good debator. I for one, in the medical field am fully aware of "what could happen", but I can't and won't live like that....I live each day the best I can and do a damn good job of it. I could care less about 10 years for now, cause there are no guarantees. Blaming cigs is such a cop out. Sounds like you are hardened you gave em up, sorta like my ex, whom I left who couldn't allow me to be me....because he was a coward. A highly educated, low life, scum wife beaten, sex addicted maniac, that works in the White House, 4 marraiges l later and God knows how many kids he's got out there...and still has no freakin clue. Yea, I want to be like him and not smoke....Ha, Hek

      • 9 votes
      #10.28 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:24 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Who ever said anyone was complaining of the consequence that could or might be

      Have you not gotten yet what the real focus of this whole thing is?

      Yes, I think I do. The whole point of the article was to complain about taxes charged on legally smoking cigarettes. If you choose to smoke, you pay taxes. If you choose not to smoke, you don't pay taxes. If you don't like the taxes, either quit smoking or change the tax law.

      I do care about 10 years from now. That's why I live each day the best I can and do a damn good job of it. Thank you very much!

      Interesting. I'm "seemingly intelligent and a good debater" as long as we agree. But if we don't, then, of course, I don't know what I'm talking about.

      • 3 votes
      #10.29 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:35 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Nope, Jane you DID miss the point. The point is I don't LIKE the taxes and found a legal way NOT to pay them. Screw the government. They've been getting FAR MORE than their "fair share" for years - and I have been the one subsidizing other peoples' bad choices because of my "sin". So I say, SCREW THEM

      • 10 votes
      #10.30 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:39 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Completely missed the point of all of this. I have to say you are hell bent on being a non- or ex-smoker and it's gotten in your way of what the issue is truly about. Of course I care 10 years from now...but I don't dwell on the day to day. See, I have faith in God...some people don't, it's another choice we have. I happen to accept ALL responsibility for what happens to me, unlike what I was shown or what I see these days. It's truly sad. Our county is in a disaster and you want to harp on cigs...come on, there are far more serious issues to be taxing and dealing with then us measly ole smokers. We don't hold up banks, murder, rape, or commit treason to smoke. We just live normal lives. OMG. You have me at respect for you intelligence, but sometimes, sometimes, intelligence is over rated........common sense is missing in so much these days. Even an educated person like myself, living simple can see that. Ignoring the real picture of what is really happening would be courageous rather then attacking something so trivial as this......a cig, come on. Hell I can't go shopping or walk down a street without being accousted in a parking lot, my own home ,and for a long time, family. Now our government won't even help us. Really sad:( I apologize if I sound harsh, I don't mean to be, I'm tired and I'm fed up with the blame game, hear it every night. Most especially the last 6 night shift I pulled...how it's everyone's else's fault. It is not. The people that are profiting from all of this are the ones to point the finger at. Please don't take me personal.....I'm frustrated with this whole issue....it's hard for me to explain, as I see it from a completely different perspective....the medical field.....and no it has nothing to do with cigs...ironically. Hek

      • 11 votes
      #10.31 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:54 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Thanks Hek, I do appreciate that.

      The only conclusion I can come to is that you folks are totally reading into my comments things that are not there. There just doesn't seem to be a way to talk about it. You seem to see everybody as being out to get you. You are determined to see attacks from everyone. I'm not "hell bent" on anything but you don't believe it. And nothing I say will change that.

      The only thing I can say for certain is that smoking for 40 years killed my mother. It was slow and tortuous (to her and us) and devastating to watch.

      • 3 votes
      #10.32 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:12 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      I watch people "die" every night, horrible deaths, and only 2, yes two were directly related to cigs. We had a 23 year year old with lung cancer die on us once, she was one of the 2. Well her family went ballistic and blamed the cigs...she was pre-disposed to her cancer due to her family's lifestyle. I walked out in the hall and said to them "Have you no class, have you no faith?" Do you not thing that all of us have a mission here on earth. Maybe it was her mission. Maybe she saved a million lives you'll never know about...they stopped @!$%#ing and blaming really quick...while I was smoking a cig with them outside on the back dock. Way too much drama and they missed it too. In the end, they forgave her for leaving them so early and went to her room and thanked her for being an example. Good or bad, we all have our jobs to perform. No, I'm not religious, but I have a great faith in something greater then me, I call him God. I don''t trust man, man is selfish and mostly evil...(cept for my good friends), but at any given time....God is the only one I turn too. I am okay with that. That is my peace. So, I just want people to leave me alone. Permanently...cept they got sumthing good to say. Ya know? I hope you get me. I'm a good person. Hek. Why can I say that? Cause I could have gone a different road and choose not too....so cigs are insignificant and trivial to me. Hek;)

      A couple of my friends have said, "Trish", you are ahead of your time", and I say "no, I'm back to basics...what we've had all along". I'm complicated, but I can break it down pretty simple. I hate complications, it takes all the fun out of life. Respectfully, Hek

      • 10 votes
      #10.33 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:26 PM EDT
      Pat N

      The only conclusion I can come to is that you folks are totally reading into my comments things that are not there.

      Oh? As I said, you sing in one note. "me me me me me". Take a look at post 10.29 and how many times you used "I". Interestingly enough, every time you use "I" there si something glowing and boastful afterward. Everytime you use the word "you" it's to condemn. How is that NOT supposed to give off the air of arrogance and a holier-than-thou, 'born again' attitutde?

      Bottom line...it is OK to not enjoy paying 125% tax on something. In fact, it's normal to be upset about that kind of excessive taxation. It is OK to enjoy partaking in a legal vice. Whether or not YOU consider the vice "bad" is of no consequence to me and quite frankly, people will ask for your opinion if they want it. The world does not revolve around your belly button, dearie.

      Lastly...to borrow a page out of your book: You gained that much weight when You were pregnant? I was pregnant too. I ate right. I only gained 26 lbs. I went home from the hospital in my size 3's. YOU used it as an excuse to stuff your face. YOU let your weight get away. YOU put your health at risk and the health of your baby.

      Are you getting the hint on how your posts come accross yet?

      • 8 votes
      #10.34 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:34 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Janeinthisworld - here's the thing I want you to hear from me....Irregardless as to whether I agree with you or not is not the problem. You speak good words and you have an opinion worth listening too.....here's the difference.....I hate arguing and fighting. This should open us all up to a common place that we can all, I hope, make us think about all the options. Please don't think for one minute that I advocated "smoking" I don't. This is more about the "principles" of our "rights". It should never be about being angry with one another because we don't "like" it but just mind our own bus...ya know. I am replying to you as I have found you to be intelligent...the only people I will address....whether I agree or not...but we must find a common ground so that we can really get to the cure for all of us. Hek:)

      On my short time here on the vine, with all my friends of many dimesions....only 2 have deleted me and I was heart broken to say the least. They were so wrapped up in their cause that it caused a break between us...both extremely intelligent and worthy of having as a friend. It still breaks my heart to this day, but I can't change people, I can only offer up my compassion when it's needed. I still "read" them and vote for them....and so it's all good.

      • 9 votes
      #10.35 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:39 PM EDT
      fstwarrior

      Hek - FR sent, OK?

      • 4 votes
      #10.36 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:05 PM EDT
      TheJonesGirlDeleted
      Boudicea

      TJG - this is your absolutely last warning. I am going to delete every comment you make which is off-topic and insulting. Just go away. This is about Cigarette taxes and stay on topic or I will KEEP deleting you. Got it? And go ahead and appeal to Newsvine all you want - I dont' give a damn.

      • 10 votes
      #10.38 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:23 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Janeinthisworld

      Oh? As I said, you sing in one note. "me me me me me". Take a look at post 10.29 and how many times you used "I". Interestingly enough, every time you use "I" there si something glowing and boastful afterward. Everytime you use the word "you" it's to condemn. How is that NOT supposed to give off the air of arrogance and a holier-than-thou, 'born again' attitutde?

      This is wrong. I have not done that. I can't help it if you interpret it the wrong way. The only "mememe" comments, boastfulness, arrogance and holier-than-thou attitude I've seen has been from posters like you.

      If that is the vitriol that comes from smokers, then I'm glad to be done with it.

      • 4 votes
      #10.40 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:40 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Please play nice, girls

      • 6 votes
      #10.41 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:37 AM EDT
      Pat N

      in a minute kjm...I promise:

      Jane -

      You just did it again:

      YOU did not do that (a positive). YOU can't help it if...(a positive) I interpret things the wrong way (a negative) I am boastful and arrogant (a negative).

      As I said before...everything you write about yourself is followed by something glowing. Everything you write about someone else is a negative. It makes you look narcissistic.

      Be careful about putting yourself on such a high pedestal, janey. One of these days someone will knock it out from under you when you least expect it.

      • 5 votes
      #10.42 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Ok, lets not "jonesify" this discussion. Back on track, alright?

      • 6 votes
      #10.43 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:09 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Yes ma'am. (sheepish grin)

      Maybe I just need a cigarette. =)

      • 6 votes
      #10.44 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:27 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Didja like my new word?

      • 5 votes
      #10.45 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:34 PM EDT
      frostyone

      lol

      • 6 votes
      #10.46 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:42 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Ok, Pat, here are some more I statements:

      I wonder if I was so mean and nasty to other people when I was a smoker. I hope not, because if I was I am very ashamed of myself. I promise I will go and apologize to everyone who had to put up with my self-absorbed, mean-spirited and twisted attitude. I know that my addiction was part of my self-centered demeanor and contributed to my ugly behavior.

      • 4 votes
      #10.47 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:49 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Please, please, please stop it! Go to your rooms right now and if I hear one more word NO DESSERT with supper! Got it?

      • 5 votes
      #10.48 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:53 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Jane?

      Peace, love and joy.

      • 6 votes
      #10.49 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:01 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Thank you PatN. Jane?

      • 6 votes
      #10.50 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:05 PM EDT
      Mary J 0604

      Pat N and Jane... Give peace a chance!!! lol :p

      • 6 votes
      #10.51 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:11 PM EDT
      mightyj

      So I was walking along of the vine and stepped on a big old peace, I think somebodies CAT left it behind. JJ

      • 7 votes
      #10.52 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:53 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Ok, I'm done too.

      • 4 votes
      #10.53 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:06 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Yay! Now we can all play nice

      • 5 votes
      #10.54 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:47 PM EDT
      Elaine-1503791

      Yeah KJM........I hope you adjusted your 'ignore' button.....I think I'll do the same as Tyler suggests. I've never done it, so it will be interesting to see how it works :)

      • 5 votes
      #10.55 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:57 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Elaine - it doesn't work - I have had that "person" on ignore for months now, but I CANNOT ignore comments in my own Article! Curiosity, you know... I guess I got my knickers in a twist this time

      • 6 votes
      #10.56 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:59 PM EDT
      Elaine-1503791

      I understand how you feel KJM, especially when it's your article. I like your moderating, at least you get involved in your articles and respond to everyone. I don't know how we're supposed to respond to insulting comments anymore. I just got back from a day suspension for arguing with a very insulting troll, so even though I should have ignored him I just couldn't.

      • 7 votes
      #10.57 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:14 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      OMG, YOU got suspended? You must be learning to speak up, girl! Congratulations! Of course, I never imagined a situation where you would be evil - even to a troll!

      • 5 votes
      #10.58 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:19 PM EDT
      Mrs D-1475814

      Standing up in front of Smokers Who Like to Smoke Anonymous... My name is Mrs. D and I'm really tired of being treated like I am out to destroy everybody in my path. However, I at all costs, must respect those who degrade me. Thank you.. WE all get it from the judgemental's. I needed that refresher lesson but, can I please request, from those who know better how to run our lives, that as Americans, can we please come out of the shadows? We have been put in our place... so why the continued anger? JMT

      Great article kjmgirl. (((kjmgirl))))

      • 7 votes
      #10.59 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:37 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      I just want to put this out there: sometimes insults are obvious. But other times they aren't insults. Sometimes we think we're being insulted when its really not intended that way. It happens, sometimes its unavoidable. I do try very hard not to intentionally offend anyone on the Vine and just try to make statements in a neutral way, but I apologize if sometimes my wording comes across differently than what I intend.

      • 5 votes
      #10.60 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:44 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Jane - you are entitled to your opinion. This is a pretty emotional topic for those of us who still smoke. We're treated like child molesters - told where we can live, what we can do. Except, WE didn't break any laws! What we are doing is perfectly legal. There isn't really any good analogy - except maybe if alcoholics were told that THEY were only allowed to drink within 5 feet of the door of the bar. Of course, car accidents are FAR less likely to occur because the driver is SMOKING rather than if he is drinking.

      Sorry if you were feeling a little bit bashed on this seed - I should have stopped it sooner. Please accept my apologies and you are ALWAYS welcome on my articles.

      • 7 votes
      #10.61 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:50 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Thanks! :-)

      • 3 votes
      #10.62 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:49 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Jane - I don't want you to go away....I think this conversation is good for all of us. You have made some valid points. However, your delivery is but harsh...almost like what I have mentioned. People treat us "smokers" as less then. The point I try to make to you and others, is that it is far more then that. I agree smoking is bad for us....but I don't and can't and won't living a life that forces us to make personal decisions cause we are put down or blackballed or thought less of. I believe in freedom choice, and with any freedom, yes there is a consequence - that comes with the territory. For Gods, sake we wouldn't even be here if that were not true. I don't hate you, just disagree mostly with how you come across, but I'm smart enough to know what your concerns are....the same as mine. Truly. I hope we can continue to discuss this topic effectively. Why don't you offer up some help to us, or those of us that are having a time quitting this habit...nothing has worked for me. That would be a great start. And then, share the good thoughts you have for doing so. I would be much more willing to adhere to your comments. I think I'm a really reasonable person, open-minded and yes, opinionated, but I would never try to hurt anyone. Sincerely Hek

      TheJonesGirl was one of those friends that broke my heart. Another very intelligent person....who's only fault is her delivary...otherwise, she's pretty cool and I still like her. I still read her posts and comment when it warrants. I value all my friendships, whether I agree with them or not. But we must be cival. I feel I am. Hek

      • 6 votes
      #10.63 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:03 AM EDT
      mightyj

      (((((((((((((Hek)))))))))))))) You are always a good read. JJ

      • 3 votes
      #10.64 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:02 AM EDT
      mightyj

      I was kind of thinking of debating Jane myself for a second there, It probably would have went a little something like THIS.

      • 6 votes
      #10.65 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:11 AM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      However, your delivery is but harsh.

      See Hek, that's what I mean by intention. I don't think I was being harsh, I was trying to be neutral. Unfortunately, in this type of forum, wording and phrasing can mean one thing to one person and something completely different to someone else. Some of the responses I received could be interpreted as far more harsh than anything I said. I try very hard to give others the benefit of the doubt when I'm not sure about their intention. I would hope the same courtesy could be extended to me.

      I know its hard to be a smoker and have conflicted feelings about quitting. I was there once myself - really...I was. Even after all the years of having quit, I know that if I were to ever pick one up again I would be hooked - snap - just like that. It scary to feel that I might not have control over something that should be so simple....and yet, we know its not.

      Peace to all. Including you Pat. ;-)

      • 3 votes
      #10.66 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:59 AM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      And Mightyj, I'd love to debate you sometime. Just don't call me "Jane, you ignorant slut!"

      • 4 votes
      #10.67 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:03 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      I can't wait for the day when the internet KNOWS exactly what intonation we are using when we post. Janeinthisworld, I love your sense of humor. FR sent!

      • 5 votes
      #10.68 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:14 PM EDT
      Brite

      Just don't call me "Jane, you ignorant slut!"

      SNL... I miss the "good old days"...

      • 5 votes
      #10.69 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:21 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      Back when SNL was actually FUNNY. Maybe I'm just getting old...

      • 5 votes
      #10.70 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:27 PM EDT
      Brite

      You and me both... I just lived through one of the most traumatic experiences of my life... my youngest ordered her first "adult beverage" legally... And I was there to see it... <sigh> I think I'm going to go curl up into a ball now, have a cig, and cry... LMAO

      • 4 votes
      #10.71 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:31 PM EDT
      mightyj

      Janeinthisworld- I was actually going for funny. I don't call people names in posts and the three or four times I have done it in the last twenty years to somebody in person left me feeling diminished for having gone there.

      If you truly want to see my beliefs on this matter I have written an article as well, I said I was going to do it to try to help some of my friends and while writing it just after an article like this one probably wasn't a good idea. This was the time I had for writing, we have unloaded into our new house and I don't have to go back to work just yet. JJ

      • 7 votes
      #10.72 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:01 PM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      Janeinthisworld- I was actually going for funny.

      I got that. As soon as I saw Dan Aykroyd I knew where you were going. The Not-Ready-For-Prime-Time-Players were my favorite! It was funny! Thanks.

      • 6 votes
      #10.73 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:56 PM EDT
      mightyj

      jane- We have a lot of fun on here. (:

      • 5 votes
      #10.74 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:04 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Pat N

      PNV...you have this amazing way of making me feel slightly unstable every time I read one of your posts. =)

      • 5 votes
      #10.76 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:29 PM EDT
      Brite

      I'm thinking one of us needs a meds check... and I'm not sure it isn't ME!

      • 7 votes
      #10.77 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:34 PM EDT
      mightyj

      PNV- I think I have found a tone and tenor for the situation. I was just hanging out with my friends staying well out of anything to nasty. I held my tongue the whole time she was going off and I have got it way personal for her since her gang collapsed my articles. I felt I was very polite in this article of my friends. I did have to crack a couple of jokes though, I did post that Jones the cat link at 10.51 but I didn't get personal with TJG.

      That said I thought you took her on like you were the thread monitor and kudos to you for knowing how far to go. I would probably get myself suspended which in my mind would be a total waste of a suspension when I could be suspended for lampooning her to the point of making people spit up breakfast. So here is my tongue in cheek take on your sarcastic scorning of me in your last post JJ

      • 5 votes
      #10.78 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:50 AM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Reply
      AlphaOneActual

      KJMGirl. My wife and I had the same idea, Buy bag tobacco. 2 weeks later the state raised the tax by 20%. Regular brand smokes are like $7.00 pack. I drive by a bar on my way home from work, there are always six or seven people smoking in the parking lot, It will hurt small business.

      • 7 votes
      #11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:57 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      AlphaOne - I feel that "is" the "bigger" plan. I mentioned the same thing and I see it all around where I live. Getting rid of the small and or private man's business and destroying the Middle Class, it's happening.

      • 9 votes
      #11.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:05 AM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      Getting rid of the small and or private man's business and destroying the Middle Class, it's happening.

      Everone I know that is in the restaurant/bar business says the anti-smoking laws have hurt their business. Family ran restaurants are the heart of the free market I pray for all small businesses to be able to hang in there especially the family owned restaurants where the real flavor of America hangs out.

      Also I want to take some time to point out the power of advertisement The ads for tobacco that used to be on TV and other media still has an effect on the public today. People believe things they see and hear especially if it is delivered over the TV because people who watch TV are already in a mild hypnotic state.

      There really is a grand experiement going on with how the mind of the public is controled. How cruel it is that for many years ads ran that cigarettes were cool fun made you have friends then it was turned around that they coause cancer. It is very powerful stuff Our minds are very open to suggestion that much is sure. It really bothers me so much what they are doing on tv and how the public just eats it up. I think children's TV ought not be allowed to show any ads at all. I know it will never happen but, I can dream can't I?

      • 5 votes
      #11.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:42 AM EDT
      TheJonesGirl

      Everone I know that is in the restaurant/bar business says the anti-smoking laws have hurt their business. Family ran restaurants are the heart of the free market I pray for all small businesses to be able to hang in there especially the family owned restaurants where the real flavor of America hangs out.

      There were studies done here in CA and business went up in bars after the smoking ban. As for smoking in restaurants, NO WAY. I go to restaurants to eat and enjoy food, it is a fact that smoking dulls the sense of taste. Perhaps that doesn't matter at the places you frequent, with their cheap, tasteless fare, though!

      • 4 votes
      #11.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:52 AM EDT
      jacq24

      Dining out became a real pleasure in NJ when they banned smoking.

      • 3 votes
      #11.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:10 AM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      Perhaps that doesn't matter at the places you frequent, with their cheap, tasteless fare, though!

      Gee TheJonesGirl that seems a hurtfull to me. I am pretty sure you have no idea of what restaurant I may or may not attend and what the cost maybe and how much taste they have either.

      I had to debate myself on if I should say something to you but I have noticed that you have gotten into attack mode when replying to my post before. Just because you cannot see me does not mean your words are not hurtful and I hope you find a little less hostile way to respond to my post because it is really not okay. Maybe you need to put me on ignore.

      • 8 votes
      #11.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:08 AM EDT
      TheJonesGirl

      I cannot imagine a smoker going to any decent place to eat that isn't a chain as smoking kills one's sense of taste.

      • 1 vote
      #11.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:17 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      In PA, bars are allowed to have smoking if they do less than a certain % of food sales. Of course, there can be NO ONE under 18 allowed inside. What's happened is that some bars just stopped selling food.

      TJG you really haven't changed. You really can't imagine anything because you're the most closed-minded person on all of newsvine. Since you are obviously a non-smoker and appear to be here for the sole purpose of insulting smokers, I'm gonna treat you like a troll. KNOCK IT OFF. If you have something of substance to say then say it. If you keep up with the one-liners intended only to insult, I'll delete you every time. Got it?

      • 11 votes
      #11.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:31 AM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      fstwarrior

      JonesGirl - wow, you are really being b!tchy today - what's going on? Usually, you have a clear logical sense of discussion, but today - BAM BAM BAM.

      Even as a pipe smoker, I have a great sense of taste and enjoy going to a really, really great restaurant for a fabulous meal that I can absolutely enjoy without some bratty kids screaming, yelling, running to ruin my meal. Would really love to shoot their parents or get them banned from the state for life.

      • 9 votes
      #11.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:20 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      fstwarrior - can you IMAGINE what would happen if the Feds banned children in fancy restaurants? WOW! I'd love to see it, though. And I would like to remind anyone who wishes to slam me for that - don't HAVE children if you don't want it to affect you.

      • 7 votes
      #11.10 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:17 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Yea, it's like walking into a PETA run restaurant.....feathers would be a flyin....LoL I just had to laugh. There are so many fanatics, but the focus is soooooo distorted. Everyone has lost sight of what is really important....that is what they want, mass confusion as to walk you right into the gas chambers again, unbeknownst. No different. Is that radical thinking, nope, somethings never change and history once again repeats itself. Everything we have fought for is crumbling. We all forget so fast. ho-hum It's all a mind @!$%#.

      • 10 votes
      #11.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:00 PM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      I cannot imagine a smoker going to any decent place to eat that isn't a chain as smoking kills one's sense of taste.

      So does artificial sweeteners and sugar!

      Well I guess because you haven't been very many places or even out of the country. I think chain restaurants were amoung the first to ban smoking though. My experience is that local family ran business catered more to smokers. This one restaurant was so popular and the non smokers used to complain to high heaven on the way to the non smoking section. The food was great and it was a very busy restaurant the smoking section was every bit as full and large as the non smoking section at slow times the smoking section would be more full.

      I remember when I was younger and restaurants first started having non smoking sections the servers never wanted to have to work in non smoking because the people did not tip as well and more likely to have messy, screaming children.

      This is a freedom issue if a restaurant or anyvother business wants to allow or not allow smoking, children or any other group they should be able to do so it should be left up to the owners. People who own small business pay taxes and for licenses, they employ people and support merchants who sell to them. In a country that is supposed to be about freedom I think the smoking regulations are just another way of kissing freedom goodbye. Government regulation does more harm than good when it comes to freedom.

      • 7 votes
      #11.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:40 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Lisafrequency - You got that right! You know what's really a pisser.....the LIES. They keep shoving @!$%# down our throat, like the caffeine issues, sugar and all that crap...and the only one making it bad...........is our Government. I'm so sick of trusting what we are and aren't suppose to do, it changes daily...so I choose to do my thing. Then I can't blame anyone, but make the best of a good or maybe a bad outcome. Life is a risk....there are no guarantees, like I have said...I'm even lucky to be here. Hek. And, I trust, as I always say, no man but God. He is my savior in every way. Hek Oh, and here's another enlightening thing I say......I am not afraid of my time...I welcome it graciously...I'm more afraid of this place we call life and all that it throws us. Well, I take that back, not Life, but People. Just sayin. Man is our own worst enemy, not cigs or anything else....just the greed from man.

      • 9 votes
      #11.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:11 PM EDT
      TheJonesGirlExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Even as a pipe smoker, I have a great sense of taste and enjoy going to a really, really great restaurant for a fabulous meal

      You think you have a great sense of taste, but I bet if you quit, you'd be amazed.

      KJM, I am entitled to my opinions. Grow the eff up. If you want to post a controversial topic, deal with responses. It seems you have nothing to say but to be a troll yourself. YOU are the close minded one. A person who loved to play the victim all day long. Who sits here with your little clique, never considering anything but your already made up mind.

      Lisa, I have eaten at some of the country's best restaurants. Ever been to the French Laundry? Didn't think so. I wouldn't want a nasty vile habit interfering with that experience.

      This is a freedom issue if a restaurant or anyvother business wants to allow or not allow smoking, children or any other group they should be able to do so it should be left up to the owners. People who own small business pay taxes and for licenses, they employ people and support merchants who sell to them. In a country that is supposed to be about freedom I think the smoking regulations are just another way of kissing freedom goodbye.

      Actually, it is an issue about protecting employees from chemicals, just as other chemicals cannot be used in workplaces. But I'm not all that shocked that you aren't aware of the WHY of no smoking laws in bars and restaurants, it would make it that much more difficult to play the victim as your little clique does so well, from you to Hek, to PatN.

      Even here in SF, it is up to the owner. If he/she wants to allow smoking in his bar, he just has to make every employee a part owner.

      • 2 votes
      #11.14 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:22 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      TJG -I'm not going to engage in a battle of Wits with an unarmed person. You don't like the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen. NOBODY but NOBODY on this entire seed has resulted to insults except you. Can't you figure out when you're not wanted? I have no problem with opposing opinions. Perhaps you haven't noticed that even your FRIENDS called you a "bitch" on this seed. Mean anything?

      • 8 votes
      #11.15 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:27 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Lisafrequency

      Actually, it is an issue about protecting employees from chemicals, just as other chemicals cannot be used in workplaces. But I'm not all that shocked that you aren't aware of the WHY of no smoking laws in bars and restaurants, it would make it that much more difficult to play the victim as your little clique does so well, from you to Hek, to PatN.

      You sound like marxist Nancy Pelosi to me.

      The more "protection" the government offers to the people the more freedom is encroached . If I wanted to work in a restaurant that allows smoking wouldn't the resposibility be on my shoulders? Does the individual no longer have rights in this country?

      Maybe one day TJG there will be something you do that becomes overly legislated and over taxed but, there will be no one available to defend your rights as an individual because they were taken out by people like you.

      • 10 votes
      #11.17 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:45 AM EDT
      Brite

      I've WORKED in some of the best restaurants in the country... French chefs are a BITCH... they throw things and swear at you in French... fire you one night, and you are back on the job in the morning... GOD I love my job... and the tasting menus are INCREDIBLE!

      There's a story about Anthony Bourdain and a 20 course tasting menu... Chef Bourdain was an unrepentant smoker (2 packs a day at the time), and Thomas Keller (the chef/owner of French Laundry) created this INCREDIBLE tasting menu... that included a mid meal coffee and cigarette... a coffee custard, infused with tobacco...

      TJG wouldn't know The French Laundry if it hit her in the face... Just let her go... As Ive said in many posts here before, I work in the restaurant industry, and I don't smoke while I'm working... I'm way too busy, usually waiting on whiney non smokers who don't tip worth spit... or cooking for them, while they change the menu beyond recognition.

      • 7 votes
      #11.18 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:26 AM EDT
      Brian White

      http://blog.tortoricipr.com/2010/02/03/osha-sets-safe-levels-of-secondhand-smoke.aspx

      OSHA has established safe levels (otherwise known as permissible exposure limits or PELs) of secondhand smoke in the workplace and those safe levels are up to 25,000 times higher than are normally found in bars and restaurants.

      Chemicals are used in a huge number of workplaces - factories, repair shops, car painting, construction, mining, etc.

      • 6 votes
      #11.19 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:26 AM EDT
      tyler

      Perhaps that doesn't matter at the places you frequent, with their cheap, tasteless fare, though!

      YOU are the close minded one. A person who loved to play the victim all day long. Who sits here with your little clique, never considering anything but your already made up mind.

      TheJonesGirl, quit making it personal. You know the rules. You're suspended for a day for violating #1 of the Code of Honor.

      Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.

      ...

      You really can't imagine anything because you're the most closed-minded person on all of newsvine.

      kjmgirl, #4:

      As the host of your column, you are expected to foster healthy, open discussions by setting a good example.

      The rest of your critique was pretty much about the posting rather than the person, but don't do that again.

      If you two keep low-blowing, you'll have to put each other on ignore, since neither of you seem to have any respect for the other.

      • 12 votes
      #11.20 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:12 PM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      I'm way too busy, usually waiting on whiney non smokers who don't tip worth spit... *or cooking for them, while they change the menu beyond recognition.

      I hear ya my experience is the same.

      * denotes empathsis mine.

      • 6 votes
      #11.21 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:28 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      You know what's really sad JonesGirl..is I still like ya for your spunk...yea, I do. But like I said to Jane, your delivary is not heard. When you can speak in a way that teaches or relates...then more could or would hear. I happen to "hear" you, but you won't even give me a chance...your loss. But you will always have my respect for your knowlege only. You could do so much if you could just put it out there in a way that it could be heard by all.....Hek, respectfully. You know what baffles me sweetie, yea - I called you sweetie....is that while I should be angry, yea and I'm passionate about certain things, I have hurt so much that I have no room for anger. I feel your anger and I wish for you to just be more open to compassion. I'm not saying be nicey nice, just be fair. I bet if we met for coffee, we'd have one hell of a conversation. And I mean a good one! Hek

      • 5 votes
      #11.22 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:16 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Hek - appreciate your sentiments, but I cannot respect or like anyone who makes a point to insult others with an arrogance that is epic in proportion. Still, I'm always glad when YOU'RE around.

      • 7 votes
      #11.23 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:20 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Thanks kjmgirl - I take all my relationships her very seriously.....you never know who you may run into someday. I am who I am here as I am in my personal life! Well with the exception of being a little more assertive when I have to be "face to face"....but what I say comes out loud and clear, lol

      • 6 votes
      #11.24 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:48 PM EDT
      Brite

      I like Hek... I liked her ever since I read her post about her stalking... she's AWESOME! and kjm... you are one of my new heroes...

      • 6 votes
      #11.25 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:52 PM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      Hiya Brite - sending FR, thanks for reading my article.....they are still looking for the guy! You know I mentioned a few times on this post, the focus needs to be on the people that truly cause others harm...not us "smokers".....but hey, they ignored this rapist for 6 months before they finally and embarassingly had to come forth and admit "they" weren't doing a damn thing about it....go figure huh? And by the way, I see you are fairly new to the Vine, Congratulations. I hope your time here is as wonderful as mine has been!!! Hek

      • 8 votes
      #11.26 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:57 PM EDT
      Lisafrequency

      Dining out became a real pleasure in NJ when they banned smoking

      Yea well why is your pleasure so much more important than someone elses?

      I think restaurants should have the choice to be smoking or non smoking because it is trhe way of freedom. How much freedom do we have to give up before everyone becomes uncomfortable? When everyone agrees that they are uncomfortable will it be too late?

      • 8 votes
      #11.27 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:27 PM EDT
      Brite

      I used to LOVE working the smoking section... I miss that... ah well...

      But what I find is that the few restaurants that HAVE a smoking section now, they are well ventilated, usually enclosed, and toward the back so that the "delicate" non smokers don't have to be near them. and they tend to fill up far faster than the non smoking section. Go figger...

      • 9 votes
      #11.28 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:34 PM EDT
      Pat N

      I feel kind of sorry for the restaurants that serve alcohol and allow zero smoking. I imagine they've seen a loss in revenue. Especially the waitstaff and tips.

      It used to be that smokers would enjoy a cocktail or two and a cigarette after a meal. Now, most of us just eat and run so we can enjoy that after-dinner cigarette.

      Here's an interesting little blurb that says smokers are the 2nd best tippers behind only other restaurant workers. Too bad the non-smoking zealots don't care about taking money out of the pockets of hard working waiters and waitresses. As long as their anti-smoking agenda gets advanced...that's all that matters.

      http://www.bigsiteofamazingfacts.com/who-are-the-best-tippers-in-north-america-and-what-are-their-professions

      • 9 votes
      #11.29 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:47 PM EDT
      Brite

      As a server... I tip VERY well... even when the service is crap, and I judge service harshly. Just MAKE me wait for ANYTHING... And you're right... smokers tip WELL.

      Non smokers, on the other hand... not so much, not to mention they want to change the menu. Everything is a special order. They make the kitchen crazy! There are two cardinal rules to a restaurant... don't piss off the kitchen and don't piss off the wait staff...

      Understand... the wait staff is in SALES. It is our JOB to UPSELL. Don't treat us like we are stupid. We know the menu WELL. If we can get it for you we will... but for God's sake... if you are going to make me run my ass off... TIP ME WELL FOR IT!

      OK... that was enough of a hijack... sorry kjm...

      • 8 votes
      #11.30 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:56 PM EDT
      Reply
      Tony Wlliams

      If I can find one of those machines then I'll pick it up this coming weekend. Problem is that they have closed almost every tobacco shop I know of here :(

      • 6 votes
      Reply#12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:07 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      I'm in NC Tony, we got plenty of them around.....Thanks God! If you want me to find you one I will. I live in Tobacco Country, well, it use to be;( Ran those farmers off too....ironically, the hospital I work in sits on top of a Tobacco field donated many years ago by the only to treat the community "free". It was a county Hospital.....and somehow, funny how it became Private.....a simple technicality, yea right.

      • 6 votes
      #12.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:14 AM EDT
      Tony Wlliams

      I'm down in Raleigh. We have fields on the outside of town that have stopped growing and so far 4 shops have closed that where near me. I know of 1 more but I have no idea yet if it's still open because I hardly ever drive to that side of town. I know I won't be going out that way until this Saturday and if that one is closed???

      Meanwhile if I can't find one close to me then my next trip westward will be a stop at the JR Outlet to see if they have it.

      Your right on the Hospital. Given out of the goodness of heart but went private out of the evil need for greed. AKA: the blood suckers need to bleed us dry.

      • 5 votes
      #12.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:49 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      You must know which hospital I work for.....and yea, Mr. Sandrock must be rolling over in his grave:( Pityful

      Anyway, we have a few smoke shops around here! Let me know if I can help you out with that, I can at least let you know the names and where they are! Fay. has plenty. Since your so close you could go yourself, still cheaper even for the hour drive it may take. Hek

      • 8 votes
      #12.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:27 AM EDT
      Tony Wlliams

      Well do. Hoping I can find something closer but I'll drop a line if I don't.

      Rolling nothing...he is spinning so fast right now you'd think he was drilling his way out to the surface just so he could smack somebody :)

      • 5 votes
      #12.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:39 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      I wouldn't doubt it......it was never suppose to happen.

      • 7 votes
      #12.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:07 AM EDT
      Reply
      Bdobb

      I've been smoking for 40 years, and my lung feels great!

      • 9 votes
      Reply#13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:13 AM EDT
      Janeinthisworld

      LOL!

      • 2 votes
      #13.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:28 PM EDT
      Rusty in PA

      C'mon, that's funny!

      • 2 votes
      #13.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:33 PM EDT
      Martin FEDWAY

      Bdobb-Any charcoal briquettes coming up through the tubes? Nutin like the dark cobb hittin your gals eye during Lassie.

      samichtym

      • 1 vote
      #13.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:37 PM EDT
      Bdobb

      Martin FEDWAY,

      You mean like in the Tarryton commercial where the men and women sported a brown eye because they refused to switch? I think that brand had micro-filter processing which removed the majority of briquettes. "Dollar up, dollar down... What'll It be boys?" Did you ever see the Seattle Bourbon Tenor Quartet? They produced a harmonious sound while belching out of their neck blow-holes...It was a riot! I think Shortie Tibtt's father was the maestro.

      • 1 vote
      #13.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:08 PM EDT
      Martin FEDWAY

      Bcobb- Wrong eye. Its the eye above the growler when on all fours.

      I remember the group they also had an album with some great songs, "You've come a long way lunger", "Show us your plaque", "You don't bring me ashtrays anymore,""Let 's cough our way to Paris", "I left my lung in San Francisco" and of course "We all live with some Yellow Nicotine".

      • 1 vote
      #13.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:31 PM EDT
      Bdobb

      Marlboro FEDWAY,

      Oh, that's nice.

      What about LSMFT:" Lungers Speak Mainly From the Throat"

      How about "Red Roses for a Gray Lady", or George Michael's "I want your O2"

      or Englebert Humperdink's "Wheeze Release Me"

      How 'bout " I am Iron(lung) Man"

      and.... Tony Orlando's "Tie your Yellow Mucus 'round the old oak tree"

      • 2 votes
      #13.6 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:11 PM EDT
      Martin FEDWAY

      Pretty good B-lung-LSMFT?

      • 3 votes
      #13.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:27 PM EDT
      General Patton

      "Tie your Yellow Mucus 'round the old oak tree"

      ..."Its been 3 tall beers, do you still want me?...If I dont see the mucus round that old oak tree, I'll cough on the bus, contaminate us, and spit the flem on meeeee, if I dont see some yellow mucus round, that old oak tree!"

      I've been smoking for 30 years...I had a lung scan a few months ago during my annual physical to make sure I'm ok and the doc said my lungs look just fine... :)

      • 6 votes
      #13.8 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:10 PM EDT
      Pat N

      ..."Its been 3 tall beers, do you still want me?...If I dont see the mucus round that old oak tree, I'll cough on the bus, contaminate us, and spit the flem on meeeee, if I dont see some yellow mucus round, that old oak tree!"

      We have some wonderfully...if not wierdly...talented people contributing to this thread. I love it.

      • 7 votes
      #13.9 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:29 PM EDT
      General Patton

      Thank you very much!

      *Takes a bow*

      • 6 votes
      #13.10 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:59 PM EDT
      Reply
      mightyj

      KJM girl- Thank you for this most excellent article. I quit smoking somewhere around 12 times before I quit for the last time. I just kept going back.

      You smoke as much as you want to, and F#ck the government for never doing a damn thing to ever help anybody with addiction but steal their f-ing money. Here we are addicted to something that is wrecking our health a little bit everyday and what do they do? Kick you when you are down! It's like operation beat down-joe public and it makes me sick.

      The worst part about it is that the whole thing is a lie.....

      1. It is difficult to quit smoking.....LIE....The people that are making money off of that know.
      2. Nicotine replacement therapy is the best way to quit ...LIE ....Where is the cocaine patch for crack addiction then?
      3. Smoking makes you feel (Relaxed, Cool, Concentrate better, Eases Anxiety, etc. etc. etc.) All very clever marketing, and all not true!!
      4. Even if you quit you are likely to start again... Only if you believe all of the lies I listed above can that be true.
      5. Free your mind, your a$$ will follow.

      I am going to write an article about what I am talking about, right now we are moving in to our house and I won't have time to do it.

      What I want to say is that I truly believe that you can smoke as long as you want and the day you decide that it is bumming you out (That day comes to us all) You can quit without all of the bull@!$%# drugs and replacement crap and it doesn't take twelve weeks either. Those people that are saying different, have a lot of money riding on you believing them.

      The government would never tell you that. JJ

      • 10 votes
      Reply#14 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:42 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      mightyj - Thank you for what you said. I feel very much the same way. I did write an article about it some time ago. Not as indepth, but basically about the treatment that we smokers are given. There are far worse things are government needs to worry about then that. Hek

      • 10 votes
      #14.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:30 AM EDT
      Just Neli

      mightyj

      KJM girl- Thank you for this most excellent article. I quit smoking somewhere around 12 times before I quit for the last time. I just kept going back.

      You smoke as much as you want to, and F#ck the government for never doing a damn thing to ever help anybody with addiction but steal their f-ing money. Here we are addicted to something that is wrecking our health a little bit everyday and what do they do? Kick you when you are down! It's like operation beat down-joe public and it makes me sick.

      I'm interested in this topic and so I'm reading all the messages. What's this stuff about the federal government that keeps popping up?

      • 2 votes
      #14.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:08 AM EDT
      Boudicea

      Just Nell - in August the Federal government raised the taxes on cigarettes to $1.00 per pack. Each state also has taxes on cigarettes

      http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/cigarette.pdf

      Here's the link. Rhode Island is #1 with a $3.46 per pack tax. That's in addition to the Fed's $1.00 per pack

      • 7 votes
      #14.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:35 AM EDT
      mightyj

      When I said the government I was painting with a broad brush. No government wants to give up that revenue stream. Where is all this health care I am always paying for but never see or get? We got people pissed off at folks for using their public health care. I have never gotten any of this health care. I paid plenty for it I just never got it. JJ

      • 11 votes
      #14.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:20 AM EDT
      Hekofawoman

      mightyj, and none of us will, it's in their back pockets;(

      • 10 votes
      #14.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:20 PM EDT
      Corie

      kjmgirl

      Rhode Island is #1 with a $3.46 per pack tax

      That was in Jan 2010. Rhode Island is now #2, still with $3.46 per pack state tax (according to the July 1, 2010 chart found here: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0097.pdf. Virginia comes in as #50, with a tax of only 50 cents. A pack of name-brand cigarettes in my state (Washington, which shows up as #3) now costs $8.59.

      New York tax is now $4.35 per pack, with an additional tax if cigarettes are bought within NYC city limits that brings it up to $5.85 a pack (those prices do not include the federal tax), per http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-01/n-y-cigarette-tax-increase-boosts-pack-to-almost-11.html

      New York smokers started paying the highest cigarette taxes in the U.S. today after an increase of 58 percent pushed some prices to almost $11 a pack.

      Some areas in my state have banned smoking outside in parks, although smokers are still required to pay taxes to support those parks.

      Some say sin taxes are inflicted upon us for our own good. I wonder what health benefits I gained by my state taxing sugarless pop and bottled water...

      • 6 votes
      #14.6 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:11 AM EDT
      Reply
      gunn62

      I am not a smoker nor have I ever been one. It's disgraceful how a selected group of people are punished for something that they enjoy doing. Not only are they taxed but also relagated to smoking in designated places only. Non-smokers even **itch when a smoker smokes outside. They act like they own the air. I have a suggestion. Since smokers are considered second-class citizens, they should stop donating to charities, stop donating blood, stop volunteering for social work or any other thing that helps their communities. I am sick of hearing all the bleeding hearts and reformed smokers condemming smokers. LIGHT UP!

      • 11 votes
      Reply#15 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:43 AM EDT
      Longhorn78759

      They act like they own the air

      Um... demanding clean air is bad?

      Since smokers are considered second-class citizens, they should stop donating to charities, stop donating blood, stop volunteering for social work or any other thing that helps their communities

      Yeah, overreaction would be the best choice.

      • 2 votes
      #15.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:55 AM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Reply
      Just Neli

      kjmgirl

      I'll quit when I want to quit - NOT when the Federal government adds so many taxes I have no choice.

      Where I live, a pack of 25 inexpensive cigarettes costs $10.30. And I say God bless every law that makes it more difficult for me to indulge in this disgusting practice. I'm working on quitting and finding it difficult, but I'm making progress and a big part of the reason is the new laws they're bringing in.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#16 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:06 AM EDT
      EnlightenMe

      I quit smoking cigarettes four and a half years ago after thirteen years of a pack-a-day habit. I quit cold turkey, and I don't miss it one bit. Was it difficult to quit? You bet your ass it was, especially because I worked with people who continued to offer me a smoke nearly every day even though they knew I was trying to quit. After a few times accepting their cigarette only to break it unlit in front of their face did they stop offering. It took about six months before that nagging urge to drive to the corner store and buy a pack went away, but it finally did go away.

      I don't miss paying my hard earned cash to slowly kill myself. I do understand the addiction though, I know how irritable you can get without that hourly fix, but I also understand that nicotine is a drug. Hell, in studies it has been shown to be more addictive than heroin. So to me this thread is less about your "right to smoke" than it is about an unapologetic addict complaining about price hikes.

      If you actually believe that smoking tobacco(or anything else for that matter) doesn't cause lung cancer then you're fooling yourself.

      • 3 votes
      #17 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:06 AM EDT
      Tony Wlliams

      If you actually believe that smoking tobacco(or anything else for that matter) doesn't cause lung cancer then you're fooling yourself.

      Smoking can aggravate the cause but it has not be shown to be the cause. All the science points to it being something that the smoke might have irritated but smoking itself is not the reason.

      People Barbecue and people work in locations where meat is smoked for sale to the public. They inhale 20 to as much as 50 times the smoke a person gets from a cigarette but no study completed shows that these people have a higher rate of any so called smoke related illness. Now if breathing smoke at 20 times the rate of a pack a day smoker isn't increasing the numbers???

      • 6 votes
      #17.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:06 AM EDT
      TheJonesGirl

      Perhaps because what is in that smoke is very different than the concentrated chemicals in cigarettes.

      • 1 vote
      #17.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:48 AM EDT
      Pat N

      Enlighten Me -

      First of all...congrats on being able to quit. That's awesome.

      But as I was reading your post, I couldn't help but notice an interesting parallel. Absolutely everything in the post could be applied to alcohol. Yet there aren't exhorbatant taxes applied to alcohol, alcohol isn't banned from eating establishments, a person isn't considered an outcast if they drink and the government doesn't use the taxes they do collect on alcohol for "anti-drinking" campaigns.

      Wonder why that is? Could it be because the majority of our politicians are drinkers and therefore, find drinking 'acceptable' but not as many are smokers?

      • 9 votes
      #17.3 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:10 AM EDT
      EnlightenMe

      Tony, it has everything to do with the shape and size of tars produced in cigarette smoke. The tars are flat planar molecules which happen to be just the right size to chemically "snip" DNA, which they do. Anytime you have damage to DNA there is a chance that it will become a cancer. The more you smoke, the more chances you have that some of that DNA will become cancerous. Sometimes the body's immune system destroys the damaged DNA, but sometimes it doesn't...at that point it becomes a cancer.

      As for smoke inhaled by people barbecuing being 20-50 times that of cigarette smokers, I'm calling bull@!$%# on that. You present it as if those workers deeply inhale that smoke with the intention of sating their addiction for it. They would suffer from blacklung if they inhaled that much smoke of any sort, just ask your local Fire Department...

      • 1 vote
      #17.4 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:51 AM EDT
      greck

      Pat N

      Absolutely everything in the post could be applied to alcohol. Yet there aren't exhorbatant taxes applied to alcohol, alcohol isn't banned from eating establishments, a person isn't considered an outcast if they drink and the government doesn't use the taxes they do collect on alcohol for "anti-drinking" campaigns.

      it would be different if every person who ordered a beer at an applebee's took the drink into his mouth, then proceeded to spit it into the air all over everyone around him, and if the drink itself had a little sprinkler head attached and shot the liquid all over the place.

      • 2 votes
      #17.5 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:54 AM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Tony Wlliams

      Easy compare the amount of smoke in the air from a grill or a meat smoker to the amount someone has coming off the tip and what they blow out.

      It's a leaf. Fire fighters, restaurant workers, factories which smoke meats, and what ever else you wish to compare it to all produce smoke an all have no choice but to breathe it in. People burn incense and that creates smoke. So why is one acceptable and the other isn't?

      People want to complain but here's the rub. Smokers pay more taxes and they pay more on insurance. They also live to be 90 and only a handful develop smoking related illness (I should know because most of my family smokes and not one has died do to smoking related illness).

      Now guess what happens when everyone who smokes decides to not buy a pack for 2 weeks? All those programs that receive funding from the taxes don't get their money. Let's see that means the medical people don't get paid, the schools don't get paid, the road workers don't get paid, and those who do testing to find cures for non-smoking related illness don't get paid. Why because if everyone quit for 2 weeks that's about 2 million in taxes gone bye bye.

      • 6 votes
      #17.7 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:21 AM EDT
      greck

      Fire fighters, restaurant workers, factories which smoke meats, and what ever else you wish to compare it to all produce smoke an all have no choice but to breathe it in. People burn incense and that creates smoke. So why is one acceptable and the other isn't?

      fire fighters- the entire point of their job is to make the smoke STOP because it will kill them if not.

      restaurant workers- people gotta eat, food's gotta be cooked. people don't gotta smoke, and smokers don't keep industrial strength ventillator fans overhead. With cooking there's a pro-social tradeoff. With smoking, there's none. It's purely self-indulgent and purely antisocial.

      • 2 votes
      #17.8 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:51 AM EDT
      Pat N

      it would be different if every person who ordered a beer at an applebee's took the drink into his mouth, then proceeded to spit it into the air all over everyone around him, and if the drink itself had a little sprinkler head attached and shot the liquid all over the place.

      I gotta admit...that was funny. But there's one thing you're leaving out.

      Impaired judgement.

      I've never had do deal with involuntarily being exposed to a fat guys...organ....as a result of them smoking too much. I've never had a quiet conversation disrupted by someone getting loud and boisterous because they were smoking too much. I've never had someone toss their lunch 3 feet from where I'm eating a hamburger at a BBQ because they were smoking too much.

      • 10 votes
      #17.9 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:01 PM EDT
      greck

      Impaired judgement.

      you're right, it's not a fair comparison, alcohol and smoking. They're different. Good point.

      • 3 votes
      #17.10 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:11 PM EDT
      Pat N

      You know what might be a decent comparison? Perfume. Cologne.

      I spent the last week out in Cleveland and found myself trapped in an elevator more than once with these young, GQ wanna-be's that smelled like they bathed in Old Spice. While I only got a headache from the 30 floor elevator ride, there are many people out there that could have suffered asthma attacks. Although more rare, there are also people who could have suffered seizures as smells can induce seizures in some.

      While cologne and perfume may not have a health effect on the wearer, I would argue that it can have a more immediate effect on innocent bystanders than secondhand smoke. If someone is sitting next to a person who is smoking for 5 minutes...they aren't going to develop an illness. However, if the are sitting next to someone who smells like a cheap whorehouse for 5 minutes, they might have immediate, serious hazards.

      But no one is calling for "no perfume on airplanes". Or "designated perfume wearing areas". Or taxing the hell out of perfume to cover the health hazards it causes.

      • 8 votes
      #17.11 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:26 PM EDT
      greck

      dude, totally with you on the cologne thing.

      remember the spicy-scented 80's? Polo? Drakkar Noir?

      patchoulli oil???? OMFG!

      • 6 votes
      #17.12 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:58 PM EDT
      fstwarrior

      Six months ago in Maryland, a worker was fired for causing an unsafe condition at work. She took it to court and lost, having to pay court costs and attorney fees for both parties.

      Her crime??? Her perfume, which she probably bathed in, caused an unhealthy work environment. She was asked politely, nicely, strongly, forcefully, and finally in front of the union stewart to either tone it down or face disciplinary action. Guess which she choose?

      OSHA took air samples at busy intersections in six large cities - NY, Chi, SF, LA, AT, and MIami of potential asbestos emissions - guess what? If you stand on a busy intersection frequently in any of those cities, you can get asbestosis, and, yes, asbestos is still being used in brakes and in clutch plates.

      Old Spice is "supposed" to be used sparingly - at least I do - just to give a "hint". Similar to perfumes, colognes, eu dee toilets.

      • 6 votes
      #17.13 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:50 PM EDT
      KFPH

      I don't think I would like to be trapped in an elevator with a guy wearing too much Old Spice

      But.......

      I wouldn't mind being trapped in an elevator with the Old Spice Guy!!

      • 5 votes
      #17.14 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:12 PM EDT
      Pat N

      I wouldn't mind being trapped in an elevator with the Old Spice Guy!!

      As long as the white horse isn't with him.

      • 6 votes
      #17.15 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:19 PM EDT
      Brite

      Is he nekkid?? (the Old Spice guy... not the horse...)

      • 5 votes
      #17.16 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:21 PM EDT
      Boudicea

      KFPH - I LIKE the way you think!

      • 5 votes
      #17.17 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:09 PM EDT
      Reply
      huxuecanDeleted
      tangrine13

      It's a losing battle...LOL

      • 2 votes
      Reply#19 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:42 AM EDT
      goguard36Deleted
      argghhh

      Smokers - Fight Back!

      They can't, they're out of breath! Ha!

      • 7 votes
      Reply#21 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:02 AM EDT
      kaviaq

      LOL. I was thinking the same thing. I pictured an army on the march...hacking and wheezing and trying to yell out slogans...to no avail. *sigh* so sad.

      Personally I support people's right to kill themselves however they see fit, as long as I am not involved.

      My grandmother's second hand smoke killed my grandfather.

      • 5 votes
      #21.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:20 PM EDT
      Pat N

      Personally I support people's right to kill themselves however they see fit, as long as I am not involved.

      Same here. Kind of like someone who wants to dye their hair dark red. Red hair dyes contain toxins that browns and blondes don't. Then there's the people that are chubby. Even slightly high on their BMI can lead to all kinds of diseases I have to pay for.

      Oh well. I think I'm going to go have a nice, bloody seared piece of red meat. YUM! I gotta remember to say grace first, though.

      • 8 votes
      #21.2 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:13 PM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Brite

      ROFL PNV... still call them when you walk too, don't you?? I know I do... ;)

      • 5 votes
      #21.4 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:28 AM EDT
      PastNikeVet-906575Deleted
      Brite

      PNV... I've been out 21 years this October... I know this for a fact, as I watched my baby <wimper> order her first "adult beverage" legally on the 17th.... now... pardon me, as I go curl up and cry some more... I'm OLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ROFL

      Oh... and my favorite was "Stomp your left and drag your right... " yeah... was FAR more dramatic when sung by 50 women going through male barracks territory at 4 am... <veg>

      • 6 votes
      #21.6 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:37 PM EDT
      Reply
      Laochra

      The price of cigarettes will never go down though, regardless of how many people start smoking rollies. We’re up to 8.20 euros per pack over here, that would be approximately 9 – 10 dollars a pack? And it’s the one thing that is guaranteed every budget to be upped in taxed. It’s a nice money maker and so long as the majority will continue to pay it, they’ll keep raising the bar. Even with smoking banned in public places, I haven’t met a single person who actually quit despite their claims!

        Reply#22 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:38 AM EDT
        savemynameDeleted
        Boudicea

        savemyname - deleted for advertising. One good sign though - the advertisers never show up until you get a nice dialogue going!

        • 7 votes
        Reply#24 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:44 AM EDT
        greck

        GOOD FOR YOU KJM!

        I honestly wish all smokers would roll their own.

        you'll smoke less, pay less, and pollute less (even better if you don't use the filters) It's win-win.

        and you never in a million years would've changed your behavior if not for the government's intervention.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#25 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:50 AM EDT
        old-vet

        I have missed only 3 days of work in my life, and been smoking since 14, and served from the "Nam through Gulf War I.

        Enough of this bull as when I see Europeans drinking, smoking and dancing until 2:00 am, and living to be 80, and we can barely make it to 57 as men, tell me what really is wrong.

        Tax the "fat" people as they are sickening to look at, take up more space and energy to move on our transportation systems, and have far more health problems than the smokers do.

        No one is paying for my health care - I do and have not been sick in all of these years as I approach 60.

        Those claiming second hand smoke damage need check the facts - go ahead and keep breathing those fumes in the inner cities with your cars and buses. The money we spend on attacking smokers could be spent on the construction of and mandating use of public transportation in our large metropolitan cities. Oh wait - we would have to make people go out and really work !!! That is simply not politically correct these days!!!

        • 8 votes
        Reply#26 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:07 AM EDT
        sheaster

        I would fight back but I am wiped out- I barely have the energy to get this 38th Marlboro lit. I think it's Epstein-Barre Syndrome..............

        • 6 votes
        Reply#27 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:19 AM EDT
        KellyB-2064143

        FuFu... so is drinking.... which by the way causes more breakdown than tobacco use of the family unit through divorce, abuse and increased medical costs to treat the abuser and abused. But you don't see anyone bashing drinkers and adding ridiculous sin tax on alcohol now do you??

        • 3 votes
        Reply#28 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:02 PM EDT
        Longhorn78759

        I can sit down with my family, have a beer and not poison anyone in the process. That's the difference.

        • 1 vote
        #28.1 - Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:07 PM EDT
        Reply
        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse |
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com